Author
Listed:
- E. Miranda
- L.C. Sousa
- C.C. António
- C.F. Castro
- S.I.S. Pinto
Abstract
The achievement of clinically viable methodologies to simulate the hemodynamics in patient-specific coronary arteries is still a major challenge. Therefore, the novelty of this work is attained by the introduction of the viscoelastic property of blood in the numerical simulations, to study the role of the left coronary artery (LCA) geometry configuration in the atherosusceptibility. Apparently healthy patients were used and four different methodologies were tested. The methodology giving the most accurate results at the same time of having the lowest computational time is the one considering the viscoelastic property of blood and computational fluid dynamics. A Pearson correlation analysis was used to highlight relationships between geometric configuration and hemodynamic descriptors based on the simulated wall shear stress (WSS). The left main stem (LMS) has the greatest atherosusceptibility followed by the left anterior descending artery (LAD) since the relative residence time (RRT) average values are 3.81 and 3.70 Pa−1, respectively. The geometric parameters with relevant contribution to directional flow change are the cross-sectional areas, especially the one of LMS segment (ALMS), and the curvature of LMS segment. For LMS and LAD segments, when ALMS increases, blood flow disturbance (r = 0.81 in LMS and r = 0.74 in LAD) and atherosusceptibility (r = 0.84 in LMS and r = 0.85 in LAD) increases. When the LMS curvature decreases, the WSS magnitude (r = 0.80 in LMS and r = 0.83 in LAD) decreases, and disturbance (r=-0.80 in LMS and r=-0.91 in LAD) and atherosusceptibility (r=-0.74 in LMS and r=-0.74 in LAD) increases.
Suggested Citation
E. Miranda & L.C. Sousa & C.C. António & C.F. Castro & S.I.S. Pinto, 2021.
"Role of the left coronary artery geometry configuration in atherosusceptibility: CFD simulations considering sPTT model for blood,"
Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(13), pages 1488-1503, October.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:gcmbxx:v:24:y:2021:i:13:p:1488-1503
DOI: 10.1080/10255842.2021.1894555
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:gcmbxx:v:24:y:2021:i:13:p:1488-1503. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/gcmb .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.