Author
Listed:
- Marija Radmilović-Radjenović
- Martin Sabo
- Branislav Radjenović
Abstract
This paper reports on safety challenges regarding spark created when the applied electric field exceeds the dielectric breakdown strength as a source of complication during electrosurgery. Despite the unquestionable benefits of electrosurgery, such as minimal chances of infection and fast recovery time, the interaction of the electrosurgical tool with the tissue may result in tissue damage and force feedback to the tool. Some risks of complications often depend on a surgeon's knowledge of instruments and safety aspects of technical equipment that can be eliminated by clarifying the causation and conditions of their development. Current trends in electrosurgery include computational algorithms and methods to control the effect of delivered energy to the patient. For this study, calculations were performed by using the COMSOL simulation package based on a multi-component plasma fluid model. The emphasis is put on conditions that lead to the breakdown of the dielectric medium. It was found that breakdown occurs most easily when both electrodes are cylindrical. For configurations with one or two spherical electrodes, breakdown voltages are higher up to 25% and 48%, respectively. With decreasing the cathode radius, the breakdown voltage may decrease even to 41%. On the other hand, the temperature increase lowers the breakdown voltage. Also, electrical asymmetries appear to be a response to the non-symmetry of the electric field between the electrodes causing differences in the breakdown voltage between 36% and 70%. The results presented here could be very useful for the design of surgical devices to prevent potential complications of electrosurgical procedures.
Suggested Citation
Marija Radmilović-Radjenović & Martin Sabo & Branislav Radjenović, 2021.
"Application of multi-component fluid model in studies of the origin of skin burns during electrosurgical procedures,"
Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(13), pages 1409-1418, October.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:gcmbxx:v:24:y:2021:i:13:p:1409-1418
DOI: 10.1080/10255842.2021.1890721
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:gcmbxx:v:24:y:2021:i:13:p:1409-1418. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/gcmb .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.