Author
Listed:
- Júlio C. M. Souza
- Sofia S. Pinho
- Maria Pranto Braz
- Filipe S. Silva
- Bruno Henriques
Abstract
Objective: The aim of the present study was to perform an integrative systematic review on the stress distribution assessed by finite element analysis on dental implants or abutments composed of carbon fiber-reinforced PEEK composites.Method: An electronic search was performed on PUBMED and ScienceDirect using a combination of the following search terms: PEEK, Polyetheretherketone, FEA, FEM, Finite element, Stress, Dental implant and Dental abutment.Results: The findings reported mechanical properties and the stress distribution through implant and abutment composed of PEEK and its fiber-reinforced composites. Unfilled PEEK revealed low values of elastic modulus and strength that negatively affected the stress distribution through the abutment and implant towards to the bone tisues. The incorporation of 30% carbon fibers increased the elastic modulus and strength of the PEEK-matrix composites although some studies reported no statistic differences in stress magnitude when compared to unfilled PEEK. However, an increase in short carbon fibers up to 60% revealed an enhancement on the stress distribution through abutment and implants towards to the bone tissues. PEEK veneering onto titanium core structures can also be a strategy to control the stress distribution at the implant-to-bone interface.Conclusions: The stiffness and strength of PEEK-matrix composites can be increased by the improvement of the carbon fibers’ network. Thus, the content, shape, dimensions, and chemical composition of fibers are key factors to improve the stress distribution through abutment and implants composed of PEEK-matrix composites.
Suggested Citation
Júlio C. M. Souza & Sofia S. Pinho & Maria Pranto Braz & Filipe S. Silva & Bruno Henriques, 2021.
"Carbon fiber-reinforced PEEK in implant dentistry: A scoping review on the finite element method,"
Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(12), pages 1355-1367, October.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:gcmbxx:v:24:y:2021:i:12:p:1355-1367
DOI: 10.1080/10255842.2021.1888939
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:gcmbxx:v:24:y:2021:i:12:p:1355-1367. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/gcmb .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.