Author
Listed:
- Yong-Jian Feng
- Kang-Ping Lin
- Cheng-Lung Tsai
- Hung-Wen Wei
Abstract
Sufficient interfragmental movement is the key to successful fracture healing in the theory of secondary bone healing. The far-cortical locking technique enables both stiffness reduction and parallel motion for ideal callus formation and fracture healing, but the influence of plate-bone gap on the performance of far-cortical locking technique remains unclear. The current study conducted a series of finite element analyses with mechanical validation to clarify this issue. Plate-bone gaps were assigned by 1, 2, 3, and 4 mm in a simulated mid-shaft fracture model fixed with locking plate and six semi-rigid locking screws. Axial compressive load to 500 N was applied to the fixation structure to evaluate the structural stiffness, pattern of interfragmental movement (parallel motion), and stresses on the screws. Results revealed the increased plate-bone gaps reduced the structural in order (315.3, 288.8, 264.9, and 243.4 N/mm). Tilting angles for determining parallel interfragmental movement (1.58°-1.85°) and stresses on semi-rigid screws for evaluating implant safety were not severely altered. Greater stresses were found on the screws adjacent to the fracture site in all simulated models. The current study suggested that 1 mm gap between the locking plate and the bone shall be ideal in view of parallel motion achieved balanced callus formation in far-cortical locking technique. Issue of reducing structural stiffness with limited plate-bone gap distance should be further investigated.
Suggested Citation
Yong-Jian Feng & Kang-Ping Lin & Cheng-Lung Tsai & Hung-Wen Wei, 2021.
"Influence of gap distance between bone and plate on structural stiffness and parallel interfragmental movement in far-cortical locking technique - a biomechanical study,"
Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(11), pages 1206-1211, September.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:gcmbxx:v:24:y:2021:i:11:p:1206-1211
DOI: 10.1080/10255842.2020.1870964
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:gcmbxx:v:24:y:2021:i:11:p:1206-1211. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/gcmb .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.