Author
Listed:
- Sami Beirami
- Mohammad Nikkhoo
- Kamran Hassani
- Alireza Karimi
Abstract
The locking compression plate (LCP) system has several advantages in fracture fixation combining angular stability with the use of locking screws with traditional fixation techniques. However, the system is complex and requiring careful attention to biomechanical principles and good surgical technique. Due to the set of complicate stresses and strains in the LCP system after implantation, the material, which is being used here, is deemed important. However, so far the materials have been limited to the stainless steel (SS) or titanium (Ti). This study was therefore aimed at investigate the biomechanical performance of the internal tibial locked plates at different material properties, including SS, Ti, carbon/polyether ether ketone (PEEK) composite, in treating medial tibial fracture using patient-specific finite element (FE) model of the human tibia. The carbon/PEEK composite materials were used at three different fiber plies configurations. Simulated loading was applied at 60:40 ratios on the medial:lateral aspect. The model was fixed distally in all degrees of freedom. The results revealed the highest stress (307.10 MPa) and the lowest strain (0.14%) at Ti LCP system. The carbon/PEEK LCP system at configuration I and III showed low stress (∼60 MPa) and high strain (0.70%), which are suitable points for designing of an internal LCP system. On the other hand, the highest value of stress in callus region was 4.78 MPa (Carbon PEEK/Configuration I) and the strain variations of callus region were between 1.46% and 3.82% among all materials. These results implied the advantage of carbon/PEEK composite materials in LCP system as they can tolerate higher strains at lower stresses.
Suggested Citation
Sami Beirami & Mohammad Nikkhoo & Kamran Hassani & Alireza Karimi, 2021.
"A comparative finite element simulation of locking compression plate materials for tibial fracture treatment,"
Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(10), pages 1064-1072, September.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:gcmbxx:v:24:y:2021:i:10:p:1064-1072
DOI: 10.1080/10255842.2020.1867114
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:gcmbxx:v:24:y:2021:i:10:p:1064-1072. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/gcmb .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.