IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/gcmbxx/v23y2020i6p224-231.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Influence of Socket-shield technique on the biomechanical response of dental implant: three-dimensional finite element analysis

Author

Listed:
  • João Paulo Mendes Tribst
  • Amanda Maria de Oliveira Dal Piva
  • Alexandre Luiz Souto Borges
  • Marco Antonio Bottino

Abstract

This study evaluated the bone microstrain, displacement, and stress distribution according to the surgical technique (conventional or Socket-shield) and evaluation period (immediately after implant installation or after healing). Each condition was modeled for the finite element analysis, totaling four groups, with a morse-taper implant and a cemented prosthesis. The maximum displacement, von Mises stress, and bone microstrain yielded higher values during the immediate stage, without a difference between Socket-shield and conventional treatments. The use of the Socket-shield technique does not negatively impact the biomechanical behavior of an implant-supported prosthesis immediately after healing from the implant installation.

Suggested Citation

  • João Paulo Mendes Tribst & Amanda Maria de Oliveira Dal Piva & Alexandre Luiz Souto Borges & Marco Antonio Bottino, 2020. "Influence of Socket-shield technique on the biomechanical response of dental implant: three-dimensional finite element analysis," Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(6), pages 224-231, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:gcmbxx:v:23:y:2020:i:6:p:224-231
    DOI: 10.1080/10255842.2019.1710833
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10255842.2019.1710833
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/10255842.2019.1710833?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:gcmbxx:v:23:y:2020:i:6:p:224-231. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/gcmb .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.