IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/gcmbxx/v22y2019i8p861-868.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A multi-body model for comparative study of cervical traction simulation – comparison between inclined and sitting traction

Author

Listed:
  • Lawrence K. F. Wong
  • Zhiwei Luo
  • Nobuyuki Kurusu
  • Keiji Fujino

Abstract

A computer simulation model was developed to compare the result of cervical traction therapy in inclined and sitting traction positions. The behavior of the model was shown to match with the intervertebral changes in the upper and lower spine from the data of a radiographic experiment. Both the results of the experiment and the simulation also showed that in the inclined position, the amount of posterior separations in the upper cervical spine remains constant regardless of traction angle, while the posterior separations at lower cervical spine increases along with traction angles. Using the simulation model, parametric studies were conducted to investigate the intervertebral space changes in response to different traction angles in the inclined and sitting positions. When using the sitting position, the subject’s hip joint stiffness was shown to cause larger variations in the intervertebral space than in the inclined position. In addition, variations in the tension/compression stiffness was shown to cause the largest changes in the resulting separations in both positions but the variations in anterior space changes were larger in the sitting position. Our study suggests that the inclined position is less sensitive to variations in the subject's body parameters and is able to provide a more reliable and predictable traction result than the sitting position.

Suggested Citation

  • Lawrence K. F. Wong & Zhiwei Luo & Nobuyuki Kurusu & Keiji Fujino, 2019. "A multi-body model for comparative study of cervical traction simulation – comparison between inclined and sitting traction," Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(8), pages 861-868, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:gcmbxx:v:22:y:2019:i:8:p:861-868
    DOI: 10.1080/10255842.2019.1600684
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10255842.2019.1600684
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/10255842.2019.1600684?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:gcmbxx:v:22:y:2019:i:8:p:861-868. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/gcmb .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.