Author
Listed:
- Ana Paula Martini
- Fernando Isquierdo de Souza
- Rodolfo Bruniera Anchieta
- Erika Oliveira de Almeida
- Amilcar Chagas Freitas Junior
- Eduardo Passos Rocha
Abstract
To evaluate the stress behavior of ceramic fragment restoration, varying the thickness of the cement layer and intraoral temperature variation. A solid model of a upper lateral incisor was obtained and a defect at enamel distal/incisal edge was restored with a ceramic fragment. Based on this initial model, 4 different models (M) were built: M1 – absence of cement layer (CL) (0 μm of thickness); M2 – CL with an uniform thickness of 50 μm; M3 – CL with 50 μm at the margin of ceramics and 100 μm in the inner area far from margins; M4 – CL with 50 μm at the margin of ceramics and 200 μm in the inner area far from margins. The environment temperature changed from 5 °C to 50 °C in 4 increments. The finite element analysis was performed. Increase the cement layer thickness generated higher stress levels on ceramic surface in all temperatures, as well as on cement interface. In general hot temperature was the worst scenario for ceramic fragments integrity, since tensile and compressive stress were more intense. The maximum principal stress on ceramic fragment was found 90 MPa for M4 at 50 °C, followed for M3 (87 Mpa). For CL, the peak of stress was found for M3 at 5 °C (47 MPa). Is it possible to conclude that thick resin cement layer contribute to higher stress concentration on ceramic fragment, and extremely hot temperatures increase the risk of structural failure, since both ceramic and \cl are exposed to higher compressive and tensile stresses.
Suggested Citation
Ana Paula Martini & Fernando Isquierdo de Souza & Rodolfo Bruniera Anchieta & Erika Oliveira de Almeida & Amilcar Chagas Freitas Junior & Eduardo Passos Rocha, 2019.
"Influence of resin cement thickness and temperature variation on mechanical behavior of dental ceramic fragment restoration,"
Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(4), pages 409-417, March.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:gcmbxx:v:22:y:2019:i:4:p:409-417
DOI: 10.1080/10255842.2018.1560428
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:gcmbxx:v:22:y:2019:i:4:p:409-417. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/gcmb .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.