IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/gcmbxx/v20y2017i4p343-354.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The twist-to-bend compliance of the petiole: integrated computations and experiments

Author

Listed:
  • Tanvir R. Faisal
  • Nicolay Hristozov
  • Tamara L. Western
  • Alejandro Rey
  • Damiano Pasini

Abstract

Plant petioles can be considered as hierarchical cellular structures, displaying geometric features defined at multiple length scales. Their macroscopic mechanical properties are the cumulative outcome of structural properties attained at each level of the structural hierarchy. This work appraises the compliance of a rhubarb stalk by determining the stalk’s bending and torsional stiffness both computationally and experimentally. In our model, the irregular cross-sectional shape of the petiole and the layers of the constituent tissues are considered to evaluate the stiffness properties at the structural level. The arbitrary shape contour of the petiole is generated with reasonable accuracy by the Gielis superformula. The stiffness and architecture of the constituent layered tissues are modeled by using the concept of shape transformers so as to obtain the computational twist-to-bend ratio for the petiole. The rhubarb stalk exhibits a ratio of flexural to torsional stiffness 4.04 (computational) and 3.83 (experimental) in comparison with 1.5 for isotropic, incompressible, circular cylinders, values that demonstrate the relative structural compliance to flexure and torsion.

Suggested Citation

  • Tanvir R. Faisal & Nicolay Hristozov & Tamara L. Western & Alejandro Rey & Damiano Pasini, 2017. "The twist-to-bend compliance of the petiole: integrated computations and experiments," Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(4), pages 343-354, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:gcmbxx:v:20:y:2017:i:4:p:343-354
    DOI: 10.1080/10255842.2016.1233328
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10255842.2016.1233328
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/10255842.2016.1233328?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:gcmbxx:v:20:y:2017:i:4:p:343-354. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/gcmb .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.