IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/gcmbxx/v18y2015i1p24-37.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Simulation-based assessment for construction helmets

Author

Listed:
  • James Long
  • James Yang
  • Zhipeng Lei
  • Daan Liang

Abstract

In recent years, there has been a concerted effort for greater job safety in all industries. Personnel protective equipment (PPE) has been developed to help mitigate the risk of injury to humans that might be exposed to hazardous situations. The human head is the most vulnerable to impact as a moderate magnitude can cause serious injury or death. That is why industries have required the use of an industrial hard hat or helmet. There have only been a few articles published to date that are focused on the risk of head injury when wearing an industrial helmet. A full understanding of the effectiveness of construction helmets on reducing injury is lacking. This paper presents a simulation-based method to determine the threshold at which a human will sustain injury when wearing a construction helmet and assesses the risk of injury for wearers of construction helmets or hard hats. Advanced finite element, or FE, models were developed to study the impact on construction helmets. The FE model consists of two parts: the helmet and the human models. The human model consists of a brain, enclosed by a skull and an outer layer of skin. The level and probability of injury to the head was determined using both the head injury criterion (HIC) and tolerance limits set by Deck and Willinger. The HIC has been widely used to assess the likelihood of head injury in vehicles. The tolerance levels proposed by Deck and Willinger are more suited for finite element models but lack wide-scale validation. Different cases of impact were studied using LSTC's LS-DYNA.

Suggested Citation

  • James Long & James Yang & Zhipeng Lei & Daan Liang, 2015. "Simulation-based assessment for construction helmets," Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(1), pages 24-37, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:gcmbxx:v:18:y:2015:i:1:p:24-37
    DOI: 10.1080/10255842.2013.774382
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10255842.2013.774382
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/10255842.2013.774382?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wenyi Yan & Oscar Pangestu, 2011. "A modified human head model for the study of impact head injury," Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(12), pages 1049-1057.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Silvia García-Vilana & David Sánchez-Molina & Juan Velázquez-Ameijide & Jordi Llumà, 2021. "Injury Metrics for Assessing the Risk of Acute Subdural Hematoma in Traumatic Events," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(24), pages 1-14, December.
    2. Wenyi Yan & Germain Sossou & Ramesh Rajan, 2017. "A multi-body dynamics study on a weight-drop test of rat brain injury," Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(6), pages 602-616, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:gcmbxx:v:18:y:2015:i:1:p:24-37. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/gcmb .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.