Author
Listed:
- Rafael Grytz
- J. Crawford Downs
Abstract
Numerical simulations or inverse numerical analyses of individual eyes or eye segments are often based on an eye-specific geometry obtained from in vivo medical images such as computed tomography (CT) scans or from in vitro 3D digitiser scans. These eye-specific geometries are usually measured while the eye is subjected to internal pressure. Due to the nonlinear stiffening of the collagen fibril network in the eye, numerical incorporation of the pre-existing stress/strain state may be essential for realistic eye-specific computational simulations. Existing prestressing methods either compute accurate predictions of the prestressed state or guarantee a unique solution. In this contribution, a forward incremental prestressing method is presented which unifies the advantages of the existing approaches by providing accurate and unique predictions of the pre-existing stress/strain state at the true measured geometry. The impact of prestressing is investigated on (i) the inverse constitutive parameter identification of a synthetic sclera inflation test and (ii) an eye-specific simulation that estimates the realistic mechanical response of a pre-loaded posterior monkey scleral shell. Evaluation of the pre-existing stress/strain state in the inverse analysis had a significant impact on the reproducibility of the constitutive parameters but may be estimated based on an approximative approach. The eye-specific simulation of one monkey eye shows that prestressing is required for accurate displacement and stress/strain predictions. The numerical results revealed an increasing error in displacement, strain and stress predictions with increasing pre-existing pressure load when the pre-stress/strain state is disregarded. Disregarding the prestress may lead to a significant underestimation of the strain/stress environment in the sclera and overestimation in the lamina cribrosa.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:gcmbxx:v:16:y:2013:i:7:p:768-780. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/gcmb .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.