IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/fswixx/v36y2025i1p59-86.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do mercenaries perform better than states? Evaluating the Wagner group’s impact on Central African Republic

Author

Listed:
  • Ori Swed
  • Alessandro Arduino

Abstract

Do mercenaries perform better than democratic state armies? This study examines the efficacy of mercenary groups compared to state military interventions, using the Wagner Group’s operations in the Central African Republic as a case study. By comparing the French Operation Sangaris (2013–2016) with Wagner’s involvement (2021–2023), the research evaluates their relative effectiveness across counterinsurgency measures, military success, and popular responses. Utilizing data from the Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project, the analysis reveals that the Wagner Group outperformed the French intervention in most metrics, including territorial gains, geographical spread of operations, and reduction of civil unrest. These findings challenge prevailing assumptions about mercenaries’ ineffectiveness. The study suggests that the Wagner Group’s perceived effectiveness, despite its controversial reputation and association to human rights violations, explains its appeal to African governments seeking security solutions. This research contributes to ongoing debates about the role of private military companies in conflict zones and has implications for understanding the changing dynamics of security provision in Africa and beyond.

Suggested Citation

  • Ori Swed & Alessandro Arduino, 2025. "Do mercenaries perform better than states? Evaluating the Wagner group’s impact on Central African Republic," Small Wars and Insurgencies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(1), pages 59-86, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:fswixx:v:36:y:2025:i:1:p:59-86
    DOI: 10.1080/09592318.2024.2418675
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09592318.2024.2418675
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09592318.2024.2418675?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:fswixx:v:36:y:2025:i:1:p:59-86. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/fswi .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.