IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/fosoec/v47y2018i2p158-163.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pecuniary Valuation in the Age of Trump

Author

Listed:
  • James K. Galbraith

Abstract

Pecuniary valuation is the peculiar characteristic of present-day American political life, with no better illustration than our incumbent president. This paper considers the responsibility of economists for this condition, in light of the inequality dynamics that helped to produce the 2016 election outcome. I show that states with the greatest increases of inequality from 1990 to 2014 invariably voted for the Democratic candidate, Hillary Clinton, while states with smaller inequality increases generally voted for Donald Trump. This outcome reflected an underlying rebellion against the professional elites. Though members of those same elites, economists have greatly undermined the reputation of this class, because their doctrines work to deny the utility of other professionals—scientists, engineers, lawyers, accountants—who serve a regulatory function in the market system. Economists therefore serve as enablers of the oligarchy, of the predator class, of the systems of direct rule under which we live.

Suggested Citation

  • James K. Galbraith, 2018. "Pecuniary Valuation in the Age of Trump," Forum for Social Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(2), pages 158-163, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:fosoec:v:47:y:2018:i:2:p:158-163
    DOI: 10.1080/07360932.2018.1451764
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/07360932.2018.1451764
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/07360932.2018.1451764?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:fosoec:v:47:y:2018:i:2:p:158-163. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RFSE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.