IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/fosoec/v44y2015i1p48-68.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Trust in online social networks: A multifaceted perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Sonja Grabner-Kräuter
  • Sofie Bitter

Abstract

In recent years, online social networks (OSNs) have gained great popularity and are now among the most frequently visited sites on the Web. Although security standards and practices are an increasing focus of attention, participants still reveal great amounts of sensitive information in the Web 2.0 environment. Obviously, online social networking takes place in a context of trust. However, trust is a concept with many facets and dimensions. To facilitate trust research in OSNs this article aims at clarifying the role of trust and the relevance of facets of trust, social capital and embeddedness in OSNs. First, the focus is on the individual's decision to trust and on processes through which trust actually emerges. Subsequently, trust is viewed as a structurally embedded asset or a property of relationships and networks that helps to shape interaction patterns within OSNs. A conceptual framework is developed that integrates theoretical concepts from the trust literature, social network and social capital theory, and helps to map different trust-related issues in OSNs.

Suggested Citation

  • Sonja Grabner-Kräuter & Sofie Bitter, 2015. "Trust in online social networks: A multifaceted perspective," Forum for Social Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(1), pages 48-68, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:fosoec:v:44:y:2015:i:1:p:48-68
    DOI: 10.1080/07360932.2013.781517
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/07360932.2013.781517
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/07360932.2013.781517?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sofie Bitter & Sonja Grabner-Kräuter, 2016. "Consequences of customer engagement behavior: when negative Facebook posts have positive effects," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 26(3), pages 219-231, August.
    2. Tate Ryan‐Mosley, 2024. "Digital peacebuilding in post‐conflict Colombia – A conceptual framework," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 15(S3), pages 47-57, June.
    3. Luo, Qiuju & Zhang, Hui, 2016. "Building interpersonal trust in a travel-related virtual community: A case study on a Guangzhou couchsurfing community," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 107-121.
    4. Darmalinggam P.* & Abdullah A. H. & Raman M., 2018. "Online Scaffolding and Experts’ Trust: Knowledge Sharing of Organisation to Students," The Journal of Social Sciences Research, Academic Research Publishing Group, pages 242-245:4.
    5. Livia Levine, 2019. "Digital Trust and Cooperation with an Integrative Digital Social Contract," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 160(2), pages 393-407, December.
    6. Vincenza Carchiolo & Alessandro Longheu & Michele Malgeri & Giuseppe Mangioni & Marialaura Previti, 2021. "Mutual Influence of Users Credibility and News Spreading in Online Social Networks," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-15, April.
    7. Zagidullin, Marat & Aziz, Nergis & Kozhakhmet, Sanat, 2021. "Government policies and attitudes to social media use among users in Turkey: The role of awareness of policies, political involvement, online trust, and party identification," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    8. Kathrin Eismann, 2021. "Diffusion and persistence of false rumors in social media networks: implications of searchability on rumor self-correction on Twitter," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 91(9), pages 1299-1329, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:fosoec:v:44:y:2015:i:1:p:48-68. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RFSE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.