IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/flgsxx/v48y2022i5p973-994.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Platforms as distinctive realms and the role of policy discretion: a cross-platform assessment of citizen engagement with Dutch municipalities through Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, and Instagram

Author

Listed:
  • Bram Faber

Abstract

Cross-platform government social network studies have focused on the messages that are being sent, and less on community responses the content generates. Moreover, little attention has been paid to possible contextual drivers of online citizen engagement. This article assesses 505 social media posts made by a sample of Dutch municipalities across four different platforms (Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, Instagram), their policy area, and the level of engagement they have fostered. The findings support the proposition of policy discretion as contextual driver of online citizen engagement: when municipalities can exert more discretionary power in a policy area, citizens could feel empowered to engage, as they could personally persuade decision makers. Moreover, although Facebook fostered the highest levels of engagement, the platforms show a multifaceted picture with respect to engagement levels and policy area. This suggests that local governments should treat platforms as distinctive realms, requiring a holistic approach to online citizen engagement.

Suggested Citation

  • Bram Faber, 2022. "Platforms as distinctive realms and the role of policy discretion: a cross-platform assessment of citizen engagement with Dutch municipalities through Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, and Instagram," Local Government Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(5), pages 973-994, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:flgsxx:v:48:y:2022:i:5:p:973-994
    DOI: 10.1080/03003930.2021.2007081
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03003930.2021.2007081
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/03003930.2021.2007081?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:flgsxx:v:48:y:2022:i:5:p:973-994. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/flgs .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.