IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/fglcxx/v25y2024i2p156-176.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Third-party intervention in high-risk situations in Africa: exploring factors influencing bystander intervention in sexual violence among college students

Author

Listed:
  • Francis D. Boateng
  • Mabel Oti-Boadi
  • Nabi Youla Doumbia
  • Queencilla Hammond

Abstract

In recent times, bystander intervention has become an integral part of the effort to address the high prevalence rates of sexual violence on college campuses. Bystanders put their lives at risk by preventing high-risk situations from happening. Despite their critical role, bystander intervention has not been adequately examined to understand their decision-making process. The current study examined the behaviour of bystanders from an African perspective using college student data from Ghana and Ivory Coast. Specifically, the study examined the influence of sexual consent attitudes, personality traits, sense of community, and prior experiences of sexual violence on two dimensions of bystander intervention. The results revealed that lack of behavioural control, sexual consent norms, and a sense of community influence bystanders’ decision to intervene. Also, while personality traits failed to explain bystander behaviour, experience with sexual violence did. These findings offer important insights into developing effective sexual assault programmes on campus.

Suggested Citation

  • Francis D. Boateng & Mabel Oti-Boadi & Nabi Youla Doumbia & Queencilla Hammond, 2024. "Third-party intervention in high-risk situations in Africa: exploring factors influencing bystander intervention in sexual violence among college students," Global Crime, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(2), pages 156-176, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:fglcxx:v:25:y:2024:i:2:p:156-176
    DOI: 10.1080/17440572.2024.2352567
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/17440572.2024.2352567
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/17440572.2024.2352567?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:fglcxx:v:25:y:2024:i:2:p:156-176. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/FGLC20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.