IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/femeco/v3y1997i1p113-120.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Argument and Community in the Markets Debate

Author

Listed:
  • Barbara Hopkins

Abstract

In this essay, I use personal experience in the markets debate to illustrate how relationships of power are used to silence opposing arguments and dominate debate. I argue that presentation of women's experience and building on previous research by feminists must be accepted as valid arguments in a feminist community. Finally, I urge feminists to work together and reject these power plays.

Suggested Citation

  • Barbara Hopkins, 1997. "Argument and Community in the Markets Debate," Feminist Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 3(1), pages 113-120.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:femeco:v:3:y:1997:i:1:p:113-120
    DOI: 10.1080/135457097338843
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/135457097338843
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/135457097338843?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peter Dorman & Nancy Folbre & Donald McCloskey & Tom Weisskopf, 1996. "Debating markets," Feminist Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 2(1), pages 69-85.
    2. Susan Feiner, 1996. "A paradigm of our own," Feminist Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 2(1), pages 94-97.
    3. Roxane Harvey Gudeman & Stephen Gudeman, 1996. "Gender, market and community on femecon in May and June 1994," Feminist Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 2(2), pages 1-39.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Elizabeth Monk-Turner & Charlie Turner, 2001. "Sex Differentials in Earnings in the South Korean Labor Market," Feminist Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(1), pages 63-78.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Giandomenica Becchio, 2018. "Gender, Feminist and Heterodox Economics: Interconnections and Differences in a Historical Perspective," Economic Alternatives, University of National and World Economy, Sofia, Bulgaria, issue 1, pages 5-24, March.
    2. Julie Nelson, 1999. "Of Markets And Martyrs: Is It OK To Pay Well For Care?," Feminist Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(3), pages 43-59.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Feminist Theory; Feminist Praxis;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:femeco:v:3:y:1997:i:1:p:113-120. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RFEC20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.