Author
Listed:
- Mathias Huebener
- Natalia Danzer
- Astrid Pape
- Pia Schober
- C. Katharina Spiess
- Gert G. Wagner
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic posed unprecedented challenges to gender equality, particularly affecting working parents due to disruptions in daycare and school operations. It also impacted labor market opportunities for both men and women. This study investigates shifts in gender role attitudes toward maternal employment in Germany during pandemic lockdowns and subsequent periods of eased restrictions, using combined data from 2008 to early 2022. During the lockdown in early 2021, the study documents a significant decline in egalitarian attitudes, especially for men with dependent children and women without dependent children in the household. The results are discussed and interpreted against the background of various theoretical approaches. During periods of eased restrictions in early 2022, the trend reversed, and gender role attitudes recovered significantly for the same groups. The findings imply that pandemic-related changes in gender role attitudes toward maternal employment were largely transitory.HIGHLIGHTSGender role attitudes became less egalitarian during the 2021 COVID-19 lockdown in Germany.When restrictions lifted, egalitarian gender role attitudes returned, indicating the changes were largely transitory.Mothers of dependent children, who shouldered most of the additional care burden, demonstrated remarkable stability in views on gender roles.Norm-setting, social diffusion, cognitive dissonance, and defense of a cultural worldview explain variance by gender and presence of children in the household.Public support for maternal employment and childcare infrastructure is important for shaping societal norms.
Suggested Citation
Mathias Huebener & Natalia Danzer & Astrid Pape & Pia Schober & C. Katharina Spiess & Gert G. Wagner, 2024.
"Cracking Under Pressure? Gender Role Attitudes Toward Maternal Employment During COVID-19 in Germany,"
Feminist Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(3), pages 217-254, July.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:femeco:v:30:y:2024:i:3:p:217-254
DOI: 10.1080/13545701.2024.2349295
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:femeco:v:30:y:2024:i:3:p:217-254. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RFEC20 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.