Author
Listed:
- Carolina Cardona
- Anaise Williams
- Elizabeth Gummerson
- Saifuddin Ahmed
- Philip Anglewicz
Abstract
There are multiple tools to measure women’s economic empowerment but limited information exists about their cross-cultural validity and reliability. This study assesses the psychometric properties of ten questions measuring two dimensions of women’s economic empowerment. It uses cross-sectional data from six low-and-middle-income settings: Kinshasa and Kongo Central (Demographic Republic of Congo), Kenya, Lagos and Kano (Nigeria), and Burkina Faso. The first dimension, household decision making, was proxied by women’s power to decide household purchases on large items, daily needs, medical treatment, and clothes. This dimension was valid and reliable in all settings. The second dimension, financial autonomy, was proxied by whether women had savings, knew where to obtain financial information, and had financial goals. This dimension was valid and reliable in Kenya, Lagos, and Kano. These findings can inform future surveys aiming to measure women’s economic empowerment.HIGHLIGHTSGiven gaps in WEE measurement, this study aims to identify a set of items measuring dimensions of WEE that are consistent and reliable across cultures and over time.Specifically, the study seeks to measure women’s power in household decision making and financial autonomy that would be consistent across six settings in four African countries.By summarizing dimensions of WEE into seven questions, it supports efficiency of current and future population surveys measuring women’s empowerment.The findings for women’s household decision making are consistent across settings suggesting they can be generalized to other, similar contexts.
Suggested Citation
Carolina Cardona & Anaise Williams & Elizabeth Gummerson & Saifuddin Ahmed & Philip Anglewicz, 2024.
"Measuring Women’s Economic Empowerment in the Democratic Republic of Congo, Kenya, Nigeria, and Burkina Faso,"
Feminist Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(2), pages 162-190, April.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:femeco:v:30:y:2024:i:2:p:162-190
DOI: 10.1080/13545701.2024.2339979
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:femeco:v:30:y:2024:i:2:p:162-190. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RFEC20 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.