IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/femeco/v18y2012i2p177-200.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Political Economy of Cross-Border Marriage: Economic Development and Social Reproduction in Korea

Author

Listed:
  • Hyunok Lee

Abstract

This contribution situates the recent increase in cross-border marriages in Korea in the context of feminist debates on social reproduction. Drawing on surveys, policy documents, media responses, and interviews, the study explores how the phenomenon of cross-border marriage in Korea coincides with changing demographic trends and policies in the domains of the family, population, and welfare. Beginning as a solution to the “rural bachelor's marriage problem” -- visible in the late 1980s -- marriage between Korean men and women of foreign origin became increasingly common in the 2000s, in parallel with the emergence of national policy issues such as low fertility and a care deficit. The study suggests that current trends in cross-border marriage and policies on multicultural families reflect the need for changes in the organization of social reproduction that has resulted from the economic development that began in the 1960s and the political-economic restructuring since the 1990s.

Suggested Citation

  • Hyunok Lee, 2012. "Political Economy of Cross-Border Marriage: Economic Development and Social Reproduction in Korea," Feminist Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(2), pages 177-200, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:femeco:v:18:y:2012:i:2:p:177-200
    DOI: 10.1080/13545701.2012.688139
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13545701.2012.688139
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13545701.2012.688139?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Picchio,Antonella, 1992. "Social Reproduction," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521418720, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Smriti Rao & Kade Finnoff, 2015. "Marriage Migration and Inequality in India, 1983–2008," Population and Development Review, The Population Council, Inc., vol. 41(3), pages 485-505, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Philip Kelly, 2009. "From Global Production Networks to Global Reproduction Networks: Households, Migration, and Regional Development in Cavite, the Philippines," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(3), pages 449-461.
    2. Deborah Figart & Ellen Mutari, 1998. "Degendering Work Time in Comparative Perspective: Alternative Policy Frameworks," Review of Social Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(4), pages 460-480.
    3. Paul Chaney, 2015. "“Post-Feminist†Era of Social Investment and Territorial Welfare? Exploring the Issue Salience and Policy Framing of Child Care in U.K. Elections 1983-2011," SAGE Open, , vol. 5(1), pages 21582440155, February.
    4. V. Spike Peterson, 2013. "Informal work," Chapters, in: Deborah M. Figart & Tonia L. Warnecke (ed.), Handbook of Research on Gender and Economic Life, chapter 11, pages 169-182, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    5. Zdravka Todorova, 2015. "A Veblenian articulation of the monetary theory of production," Working Papers PKWP1501, Post Keynesian Economics Society (PKES).
    6. Victor S. Venida, 2020. "Updates of Empirical Estimates of Marxian Categories: The Philippines 1961-2012," Department of Economics, Ateneo de Manila University, Working Paper Series 202011, Department of Economics, Ateneo de Manila University.
    7. Tindara Addabbo, 2017. "Work and public policies: the interweaving of feminist economics and the capability approach," EKONOMIAZ. Revista vasca de Economía, Gobierno Vasco / Eusko Jaurlaritza / Basque Government, vol. 91(01), pages 76-99.
    8. Mónica Domínguez-Serrano & Lucía Moral Espín, 2018. "From Relevant Capabilities to Relevant Indicators: Defining an Indicator System for Children’s Well-Being in Spain," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 11(1), pages 1-25, February.
    9. Daniel López-García & Manuel González de Molina, 2021. "An Operational Approach to Agroecology-Based Local Agri-Food Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-18, July.
    10. Tim Cresswell & Sara Dorow & Sharon Roseman, 2016. "Putting mobility theory to work: Conceptualizing employment-related geographical mobility," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 48(9), pages 1787-1803, September.
    11. Todorova, Zdravka, 2014. "From Monetary Theory of Production to Culture-Nature Life Process:Feminist-Institutional Elaborations of Social Provisioning," MPRA Paper 54681, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    12. Maria Daskalaki & Marianna Fotaki & Maria Simosi, 2021. "The gendered impact of the financial crisis: Struggles over social reproduction in Greece," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 53(4), pages 741-762, June.
    13. Rai, Shirin M. & Brown, Benjamin D. & Ruwanpura, Kanchana N., 2019. "SDG 8: Decent work and economic growth – A gendered analysis," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 368-380.
    14. Roger Lee, 2000. "Radical and Postmodern? Power, Social Relations, and Regimes of Truth in the Social Construction of Alternative Economic Geographies," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 32(6), pages 991-1009, June.
    15. Lisa Philipps, 2008. "Silent partners: The role of unpaid market labor in families," Feminist Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(2), pages 37-57.
    16. Carla Del Gesso, 2019. "Gender Budgeting Implementation in Italian Regional Governments: Institutional Behavior for Gender Equality and Women’s Empowerment," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(12), pages 110-110, November.
    17. R Lee, 1995. "Look after the Pounds and the People Will Look after Themselves: Social Reproduction, Regulation, and Social Exclusion in Western Europe," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 27(10), pages 1577-1594, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:femeco:v:18:y:2012:i:2:p:177-200. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RFEC20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.