IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/eurjfi/v31y2025i5p616-646.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does it pay to be Green? The impact of equator principles on project loans

Author

Listed:
  • Gabriel J. Power
  • Djerry C. Tandja-M.

Abstract

Some financial institutions voluntarily adopt the Equator Principles, requiring them to monitor the environmental and social (ESG) impacts of projects they finance. We investigate the incidence of these costs on corporate borrowers, as well as evidence of benefits in the form of improved loan terms. Using detailed international loan data, we find that borrowers dealing with green banks derive several economic benefits including lower loan spreads. We argue that dealing with ‘green banks’ allows firms to signal their ESG commitment and can help them manage ex post ESG-related risk. The empirical approach also addresses endogeneity concerns. We document other benefits including greater lender participation and the support of Multilateral Development Banks. Our counterfactual analysis, however, shows that if regulatory changes were to encourage working with green banks, firms that only deal with them as a result of the policy would not obtain lower loan spreads.

Suggested Citation

  • Gabriel J. Power & Djerry C. Tandja-M., 2025. "Does it pay to be Green? The impact of equator principles on project loans," The European Journal of Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(5), pages 616-646, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:eurjfi:v:31:y:2025:i:5:p:616-646
    DOI: 10.1080/1351847X.2024.2419568
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/1351847X.2024.2419568
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/1351847X.2024.2419568?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:eurjfi:v:31:y:2025:i:5:p:616-646. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/REJF20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.