IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/eurjfi/v31y2025i3p318-347.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Portfolio optimization beyond utility maximization: the case of driftless markets

Author

Listed:
  • Jan Vecer
  • Mark Richard
  • Stephen Taylor

Abstract

This paper presents a novel perspective on portfolio optimization by recognizing that prices can be expressed as a scaled likelihood ratio of state price densities. This insight leads to the immediate conclusion that the optimal portfolio has a simple representation in terms of the likelihood ratio between the agent-defined physical measure and the risk-neutral measure, eliminating the need for utility maximization. The agent only needs to specify her choice of the physical measure, and we demonstrate both frequentist and Bayesian approaches for this selection. Utility maximization can be seen as a specific method for choosing the physical measure. The resulting likelihood ratio is log-utility optimal with respect to all benchmarks, aligning our approach with finding the growth optimal portfolio described in the literature. Notably, the expected log return corresponds to the relative entropy between the physical and risk-neutral measures, establishing a fundamental link to information theory. As a proof of concept, we explore previously unexplored territory in portfolio optimization, specifically addressing perceived mean reversion in specific driftless markets, such as foreign exchange (FX) markets.

Suggested Citation

  • Jan Vecer & Mark Richard & Stephen Taylor, 2025. "Portfolio optimization beyond utility maximization: the case of driftless markets," The European Journal of Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(3), pages 318-347, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:eurjfi:v:31:y:2025:i:3:p:318-347
    DOI: 10.1080/1351847X.2024.2375221
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/1351847X.2024.2375221
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/1351847X.2024.2375221?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:eurjfi:v:31:y:2025:i:3:p:318-347. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/REJF20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.