IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/eurjfi/v30y2024i12p1386-1405.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Information processing costs and credit ratings: evidence from investor interactive platforms in China

Author

Listed:
  • Rongli Yuan
  • Wenyue Jin
  • Lisha Luo-Yang

Abstract

We examine the impact on bond credit ratings of reduced information processing costs from two investor interactive platforms in China, i.e. ‘Easy Interaction’ and ‘e-Interaction’. These online platforms provide investors with a channel to directly communicate with listed companies and learn much of corporate operations. Replies and explanations from management assist investors in integrating disclosed information and reducing information processing costs. The reduced costs likely impose reputational concerns on credit rating agencies (CRAs), leading to more stringent rating standards and less rating inflation. We find that more interactions result in lower credit ratings of corporate bonds. This effect is more pronounced for bonds rated by global-partnered CRAs and bonds whose issuers have higher information complexity, and less pronounced for bonds whose issuers have official consultation websites. Further analyses show that reduced information processing costs are associated with more information contents in rating downgrades and timelier ratings. Our findings provide evidence for the disciplinary effect of reduced processing costs on CRA behavior.

Suggested Citation

  • Rongli Yuan & Wenyue Jin & Lisha Luo-Yang, 2024. "Information processing costs and credit ratings: evidence from investor interactive platforms in China," The European Journal of Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(12), pages 1386-1405, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:eurjfi:v:30:y:2024:i:12:p:1386-1405
    DOI: 10.1080/1351847X.2023.2293105
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/1351847X.2023.2293105
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/1351847X.2023.2293105?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:eurjfi:v:30:y:2024:i:12:p:1386-1405. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/REJF20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.