IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/eurjfi/v2y1996i3p297-304.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A note on the efficiency of the binomial option pricing model

Author

Listed:
  • Les Clewlow
  • Andrew Carverhill

Abstract

We discuss the efficiency of the binomial option pricing model for single and multivariate American style options. We demonstrate how the efficiency of lattice techniques such as the binomial model can be analysed in terms of their computational cost. For the case of a single underlying asset the most efficient implementation is the extrapolated jump-back method: that is, to value a series of options with nested discrete sets of early exercise opportunities by jumping across the lattice between the early exercise times and then extrapolating from these values to the limit of a continuous exercise opportunity set. For the multivariate case, the most efficient method depends on the computational cost of the early exercise test. However, for typical problems, the most efficient method is the standard step-back method: that is, performing the early exercise test at each time step.

Suggested Citation

  • Les Clewlow & Andrew Carverhill, 1996. "A note on the efficiency of the binomial option pricing model," The European Journal of Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 2(3), pages 297-304.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:eurjfi:v:2:y:1996:i:3:p:297-304
    DOI: 10.1080/13518479600000010
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13518479600000010
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13518479600000010?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:eurjfi:v:2:y:1996:i:3:p:297-304. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/REJF20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.