IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/eurjfi/v25y2019i12p1077-1098.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Use of active peer benchmarks in assessing UK mutual fund performance and performance persistence

Author

Listed:
  • Irina B. Mateus
  • Cesario Mateus
  • Natasa Todorovic

Abstract

The majority of UK style-specific mutual funds either report a broad market index as their prospectus benchmark or give no benchmark at all – a practice that may be (a) strategic, or (b) cultural and attributable to the lack of UK style-specific indices (e.g. mid-cap-growth, small-cap-value). The choice of a broad market index as a benchmark can bias the inferences of a fund’s performance and performance persistence. This study is the first to provide an alternative to style-specific indices in the UK, and suggests the use style-specific peer group benchmarks, following [Hunter, D., E. Kandel, S. Kandel, and R. Wermers. 2014. “Mutual Fund Performance Evaluation with Active Peer Benchmarks.” Journal of Financial Economics 112 (1): 1–29]. Our sample comprises of 817 active UK long-only equity mutual funds allocated to nine Morningstar style categories (peer groups) during the period 1992–2016. We show that the funds with the most significant positive peer-group-adjusted alphas continue to perform well one year ahead, in terms of both parametric and non-parametric measures of persistence in performance. Moreover, persistence in performance is driven by both winner and loser funds. The results within each peer group are by and large consistent with these findings.

Suggested Citation

  • Irina B. Mateus & Cesario Mateus & Natasa Todorovic, 2019. "Use of active peer benchmarks in assessing UK mutual fund performance and performance persistence," The European Journal of Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(12), pages 1077-1098, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:eurjfi:v:25:y:2019:i:12:p:1077-1098
    DOI: 10.1080/1351847X.2019.1581639
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/1351847X.2019.1581639
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/1351847X.2019.1581639?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Marwa Zouaoui, 2019. "Selectivity and Market Timing Ability of Fund Managers: Comparative Analysis of Islamic and Conventional HSBC Saudi Mutual Funds," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-19, September.
    2. Keith Cuthbertson & Dirk Nitzsche & Niall O’Sullivan, 2023. "UK mutual funds: performance persistence and portfolio size," Journal of Asset Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 24(4), pages 284-298, July.
    3. Cesario Mateus & Irina B. Mateus & Marco Soggiu, 2020. "Do smart beta ETFs deliver persistent performance?," Journal of Asset Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 21(5), pages 413-427, September.
    4. Cesario Mateus & Irina B. Mateus & Marco Soggiu, 0. "Do smart beta ETFs deliver persistent performance?," Journal of Asset Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 0, pages 1-15.
    5. Alsubaiei, Bader Jawid & Calice, Giovanni & Vivian, Andrew, 2024. "How does oil market volatility impact mutual fund performance?," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 89(PA), pages 1601-1621.
    6. Zhang, Jinhua & Wang, Guipu & Yan, Cheng, 2020. "Can foreign equity funds outperform their benchmarks? New evidence from fund-holding data for China," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 11-20.
    7. Otero-González, Luis & Durán-Santomil, Pablo, 2021. "Is quantitative and qualitative information relevant for choosing mutual funds?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 476-488.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:eurjfi:v:25:y:2019:i:12:p:1077-1098. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/REJF20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.