IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/euract/v4y1995i3p535-554.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The case for the shareholder panel in the UK

Author

Listed:
  • David Hatherly

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • David Hatherly, 1995. "The case for the shareholder panel in the UK," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(3), pages 535-554.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:euract:v:4:y:1995:i:3:p:535-554
    DOI: 10.1080/09638189500000031
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09638189500000031
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09638189500000031?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Maria Antonia Garcia-Benau & Christopher Humphrey, 1992. "Beyond the audit expectations gap," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 1(2), pages 303-331.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Constantinos V. Caramanis, 1997. "The enigma of the Greek auditing profession: some preliminary results concerning the impact of liberalization on auditor behaviour," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(1), pages 85-108, May.
    2. David Hatherly, 1999. "The future of auditing: the debate in the UK," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(1), pages 51-65.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gary S. Monroe & David R. Woodliff, 1994. "Great Expectations: Public Perceptions Of The Auditor's Role," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 4(8), pages 42-53, November.
    2. Danuta Krzywda & Derek Bailey & Marek Schroeder, 1998. "The development of the role of the statutory audit in the transitional Polish economy," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(3), pages 407-440.
    3. Oriol Amat & John Blake & Jack Dowds, 1998. "The ethics of creative accounting," Economics Working Papers 349, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
    4. Constantinos V. Caramanis, 1997. "The enigma of the Greek auditing profession: some preliminary results concerning the impact of liberalization on auditor behaviour," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(1), pages 85-108, May.
    5. Arrunada, Benito, 1999. "The provision of non-audit services by auditors let the market evolve and decide," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 19(4), pages 513-531, December.
    6. Klaus Ruhnke & Martin Schmidt, 2014. "The audit expectation gap: existence, causes, and the impact of changes," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(5), pages 572-601, October.
    7. Vicente Montesinos Julve, 1998. "Accounting and Business Economics in Spain," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(3), pages 357-380.
    8. Nieves Carrera & Isabel Gutierrez & Salvador Carmona, 2001. "Gender, the state and the audit profession: evidence from Spain (1942-88)," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(4), pages 803-815.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:euract:v:4:y:1995:i:3:p:535-554. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/REAR20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.