IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/euract/v33y2024i3p1075-1103.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do Auditors Respond to Clients’ Climate Change-related External Risks? Evidence from Audit Fees

Author

Listed:
  • Sven Hartlieb
  • Brigitte Eierle

Abstract

In this study, we investigate whether auditors consider their clients’ climate change-related external risks when making audit pricing decisions. Using county-level proxies based on the number of declared natural disasters and the level of societal climate change awareness, we discover that clients with greater exposure to climate change risks pay significantly higher audit fees. After performing several additional tests, we conclude that auditors consider climate change risks and their potential consequences as a systematic business risk that is factored into the audit fees. For instance, we demonstrate that clients’ climate risk exposure has become more strongly associated with audit pricing in recent years, as climate change has gained greater importance in public debate. Moreover, we discover that auditors place a greater emphasis on clients’ climate risks when they themselves are located in regions with higher climate change awareness, indicating that auditors’ climate change perception also matters. Given the growing interest in climate change-related risks in practice and research, as well as the significance expected to be placed on these risks in the future, our findings are timely and should appeal to a wide range of readers, including investors, regulators, and scholars.

Suggested Citation

  • Sven Hartlieb & Brigitte Eierle, 2024. "Do Auditors Respond to Clients’ Climate Change-related External Risks? Evidence from Audit Fees," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(3), pages 1075-1103, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:euract:v:33:y:2024:i:3:p:1075-1103
    DOI: 10.1080/09638180.2022.2141811
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09638180.2022.2141811
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09638180.2022.2141811?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:euract:v:33:y:2024:i:3:p:1075-1103. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/REAR20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.