IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/eujhet/v4y1997i2p237-257.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

William Huskisson and the bullion controversy, 1810

Author

Listed:
  • Nathan Sussman

Abstract

The debate concerning the return to the gold standard in England during and in the aftermath of the Napoleonic Wars, and the subsequent resumption of convertibility in 1819, played a significant role in British monetary orthodoxy. Its impact culminated in the 1925 decision to return to gold at prewar parity. Examining the contribution of William Huskisson - one of the authors of the Bullion Report - to the bullion controversy I argue that he played a major role in shaping British monetary policy of the nineteenth century.

Suggested Citation

  • Nathan Sussman, 1997. "William Huskisson and the bullion controversy, 1810," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(2), pages 237-257.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:eujhet:v:4:y:1997:i:2:p:237-257
    DOI: 10.1080/10427719700000038
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10427719700000038
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/10427719700000038?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Christopher Rowe, 2018. "William Huskisson And The Rhetoric Of Free Trade," Economic Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(2), pages 207-223, June.
    2. Carolyn Sissoko, 2022. "Becoming a central bank: The development of the Bank of England's private sector lending policies during the Restriction," Economic History Review, Economic History Society, vol. 75(2), pages 601-632, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:eujhet:v:4:y:1997:i:2:p:237-257. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/REJH20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.