IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/eujhet/v23y2016i4p597-610.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

All in the best possible taste: Adam Smith and the leaders of fashion

Author

Listed:
  • Craig Smith

Abstract

Adam Smith devotes a great deal of attention to the role of fashion in the relationship between the social classes. Smith's general account of fashion is grounded on the transmission of fashion from the rich to the poor. However, when it comes to accounting for the generation of fashion amongst the wealthy class, Smith's account moves away from wealth distinctions and focuses instead on more sophisticated forms of social judgement. This paper examines Smith's general account of fashion between the classes and then identifies the refinements to the account that he provides when he considers the operation of fashion amongst the rich. The paper suggests that the operative distinction among the wealthy is not relative wealth, but rather reputation for taste, and concludes with a discussion of the “man of taste” in Smith's account of fashion.

Suggested Citation

  • Craig Smith, 2016. "All in the best possible taste: Adam Smith and the leaders of fashion," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(4), pages 597-610, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:eujhet:v:23:y:2016:i:4:p:597-610
    DOI: 10.1080/09672567.2014.997834
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09672567.2014.997834
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09672567.2014.997834?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jeffrey T. Young, 1997. "Economics as a Moral Science," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 842.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Scott Drylie, 2020. "Professional Scholarship from 1893 to 2020 on Adam Smith’s Views on School Funding: A Heterodox Examination," Econ Journal Watch, Econ Journal Watch, vol. 17(2), pages 350–391-3, September.
    2. Matthias P. Hühn & Claus Dierksmeier, 2016. "Will the Real A. Smith Please Stand Up!," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 136(1), pages 119-132, June.
    3. Alvey, James E., 2003. "Adam Smith'S Globalization (But Anti-Secularization) Theory," Discussion Papers 23716, Massey University, Department of Applied and International Economics.
    4. Fazekas, Károly, 2016. "Tisztesség, empátia, közgazdaságtan [Honour, empathy and economics]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(10), pages 1120-1141.
    5. John Elliott, 2000. "Adam Smith's Conceptualization of Power, Markets, and Politics," Review of Social Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(4), pages 429-454.
    6. Ahmad Jafari Samimi, 2011. "Ethonomics & the History of Economic Thought," Journal of Social and Development Sciences, AMH International, vol. 2(5), pages 223-232.
    7. Santori, Paolo & Assistant, JHET, 2021. "Idleness and the Very Sparing Hand of God: The invisible tie between Hume’s "Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion" and Smith’s "Wealth of Nations"," OSF Preprints r2uje, Center for Open Science.
    8. James E. Alvey, 2011. "A Short History of Ethics and Economics," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 12674.
    9. Laurie Bréban, 2012. "Sensitivity to prosperity and adversity: What would a Smithian function of happiness look like?," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(4), pages 551-586, September.
    10. Alvey, James E., 2004. "The Theological Foundation Of Adam Smith'S Work," Discussion Papers 23713, Massey University, Department of Applied and International Economics.
    11. Jean Dellemotte & Benoît Walraevens, 2015. "Adam Smith on the subordination of wage-earners in the commercial society," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(4), pages 692-727, August.
    12. Mark White, 2010. "Adam Smith and Immanuel Kant: On Markets, Duties, and Moral Sentiments," Forum for Social Economics, Springer;The Association for Social Economics, vol. 39(1), pages 53-60, April.
    13. Nava Ashraf & Colin F. Camerer & George Loewenstein, 2005. "Adam Smith, Behavioral Economist," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 19(3), pages 131-145, Summer.
    14. Robinson, John A. & Subrick, J. Robert, 2021. "Why did Smith suggest a labor theory of value?," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 781-787.
    15. Lisa Herzog, 2011. "Higher and lower virtues in commercial society," Politics, Philosophy & Economics, , vol. 10(4), pages 370-395, November.
    16. Amos Witztum & Jeffrey T. Young, 2013. "Utilitarianism and the role of utility in Adam Smith," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(4), pages 572-602, August.
    17. Alvey, James E., 2003. "Adam Smith'S View Of History: Consistent Or Paradoxical?," Discussion Papers 23710, Massey University, Department of Applied and International Economics.
    18. Laurie Bréban, 2017. "An Investigation into the Smithian System of Sympathy: from Cognition to Emotion," Working Papers hal-01467340, HAL.
    19. Anup Dash, 2016. "An Epistemological Reflection on Social and Solidarity Economy," Forum for Social Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(1), pages 61-87, February.
    20. Gavin Kennedy, 2009. "A Reply to Daniel Klein on Adam Smith and the Invisible Hand," Econ Journal Watch, Econ Journal Watch, vol. 6(3), pages 374-388, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:eujhet:v:23:y:2016:i:4:p:597-610. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/REJH20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.