IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/eujhet/v22y2015i3p383-419.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Figures of mockery. The cultural disqualification of physiocracy (1760-1790)

Author

Listed:
  • Arnaud Orain

Abstract

By studying seriously a literature generally dismissed by the historians of economics - satires, tales, theatrical works, pamphlets, poems, and songs that mock with humour the physiocrats, their fellow-travellers, and their doctrines - this paper reveals what was made of them and their ideas, who did this, and the underlying whys and wherefores. Three major forms of critiques are considered. The first, that of a Church (the Encyclopédistes ) fighting a rising heresy (the physiocrats), concludes that the fanaticism of the latter is incompatible with the virtues of tolerance that must characterise the true philosophes . In the second form, the Encyclopédistes and the Économistes are assimilated. Both led to the destruction of the old taxonomy of society and even to death, to famine and to a chaos of transgression. The third form concerns the dubious parallel between the y-king of ancient China and the Tableau économique . These three types of cultural writings capture and explain something new - physiocratic political economy - thanks to well-known mental constructs. It stages characters and facts in order to give meaning to events the causes of which are difficult to explain. It is, beyond all the irony and mockery, an attempt to understand and to defuse new fears resulting from this incredible endeavour to change reality.

Suggested Citation

  • Arnaud Orain, 2015. "Figures of mockery. The cultural disqualification of physiocracy (1760-1790)," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(3), pages 383-419, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:eujhet:v:22:y:2015:i:3:p:383-419
    DOI: 10.1080/09672567.2014.1003952
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09672567.2014.1003952
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09672567.2014.1003952?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Patalano, Rosario, 2020. "Ferdinando Galiani’S Newtonian Social Mathematics," Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Cambridge University Press, vol. 42(3), pages 357-383, September.
    2. Borokh, O., 2021. "China in Quesnay's doctrine: Interpretations, translations, cultural aspects," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 50(2), pages 137-162.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:eujhet:v:22:y:2015:i:3:p:383-419. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/REJH20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.