IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/entreg/v36y2024i7-8p1096-1117.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Organizational ambidexterity in young SMEs? The incompatibility of entrepreneurial orientation and process improvement

Author

Listed:
  • Jesper Raalskov
  • Jakob Schlichter
  • Anders Haug
  • Kim Klyver

Abstract

Organizational ambidexterity describes firms’ ability to pursue exploration and exploitation strategies simultaneously. It is, however, unclear if young SMEs should seek to develop organizations with this ability or if they are better off focusing on just one strategy. To shed light on this matter, this paper investigates the interaction between entrepreneurial orientation (EO) (organic organizing) and process improvement (mechanistic organizing) in relation to firm growth in young SMEs (small and medium-sized enterprises). We hypothesize that both types of strategies can produce growth for young SMEs but that, due to their incompatibility, young SMEs do not have the resources needed to successfully pursue them both. We test these hypotheses on a sample of 257 young Danish SMEs. Our results confirm that both EO and process improvement have a positive effect on firm growth. The results further show that while process improvement has a considerable positive effect in low EO firms, for high EO firms, this effect is minimal. Thus, high EO firms may waste important resources by putting too much effort into process improvement initiatives.

Suggested Citation

  • Jesper Raalskov & Jakob Schlichter & Anders Haug & Kim Klyver, 2024. "Organizational ambidexterity in young SMEs? The incompatibility of entrepreneurial orientation and process improvement," Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(7-8), pages 1096-1117, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:entreg:v:36:y:2024:i:7-8:p:1096-1117
    DOI: 10.1080/08985626.2024.2310112
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/08985626.2024.2310112
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/08985626.2024.2310112?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:entreg:v:36:y:2024:i:7-8:p:1096-1117. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/TEPN20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.