IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/emetrv/v35y2016i4p553-585.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Improving the Power of Tests of Stochastic Dominance

Author

Listed:
  • Stephen G. Donald
  • Yu-Chin Hsu

Abstract

We extend Hansen's (2005) recentering method to a continuum of inequality constraints to construct new Kolmogorov--Smirnov tests for stochastic dominance of any pre-specified order. We show that our tests have correct size asymptotically, are consistent against fixed alternatives and are unbiased against some N -super-−1/2 local alternatives. It is shown that by avoiding the use of the least favorable configuration, our tests are less conservative and more powerful than Barrett and Donald's (2003) and in some simulation examples we consider, we find that our tests can be more powerful than the subsampling test of Linton et al. (2005). We apply our method to test stochastic dominance relations between Canadian income distributions in 1978 and 1986 as considered in Barrett and Donald (2003) and find that some of the hypothesis testing results are different using the new method.

Suggested Citation

  • Stephen G. Donald & Yu-Chin Hsu, 2016. "Improving the Power of Tests of Stochastic Dominance," Econometric Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(4), pages 553-585, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:emetrv:v:35:y:2016:i:4:p:553-585
    DOI: 10.1080/07474938.2013.833813
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/07474938.2013.833813
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/07474938.2013.833813?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version below or search for a different version of it.

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yu-Chin Hsu & Martin Huber & Ying-Ying Lee & Chu-An Liu, 2021. "Testing Monotonicity of Mean Potential Outcomes in a Continuous Treatment with High-Dimensional Data," Papers 2106.04237, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2022.
    2. Toru Kitagawa & Aleksey Tetenov, 2018. "Who Should Be Treated? Empirical Welfare Maximization Methods for Treatment Choice," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 86(2), pages 591-616, March.
    3. Chang, Chia-Lin & Jimenez-Martin, Juan-Angel & Maasoumi, Esfandiar & McAleer, Michael & Pérez-Amaral, Teodosio, 2019. "Choosing expected shortfall over VaR in Basel III using stochastic dominance," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 95-113.
    4. Chia-Lin Chang & Juan-Ángel Jiménez-Martín & Esfandiar Maasoumi & Michael McAleer & Teodosio Pérez-Amaral, 2015. "A Stochastic Dominance Approach to the Basel III Dilemma: Expected Shortfall or VaR?," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 15-056/III, Tinbergen Institute.
    5. Yoichi Arai & Yu‐Chin Hsu & Toru Kitagawa & Ismael Mourifié & Yuanyuan Wan, 2022. "Testing identifying assumptions in fuzzy regression discontinuity designs," Quantitative Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 13(1), pages 1-28, January.
    6. Hongyi Jiang & Zhenting Sun & Shiyun Hu, 2023. "A Nonparametric Test of $m$th-degree Inverse Stochastic Dominance," Papers 2306.12271, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2023.
    7. Goldman, Matt & Kaplan, David M., 2018. "Comparing distributions by multiple testing across quantiles or CDF values," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 206(1), pages 143-166.
    8. Barrett, Garry F. & Donald, Stephen G. & Hsu, Yu-Chin, 2016. "Consistent tests for poverty dominance relations," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 191(2), pages 360-373.
    9. Chang, Chia-Lin & Jiménez-Martín, Juan-Ángel & Maasoumi, Esfandiar & Pérez-Amaral, Teodosio, 2015. "A stochastic dominance approach to financial risk management strategies," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 187(2), pages 472-485.
    10. Rami V. Tabri & Mathew J. Elias, 2024. "Testing for Restricted Stochastic Dominance under Survey Nonresponse with Panel Data: Theory and an Evaluation of Poverty in Australia," Papers 2406.15702, arXiv.org.
    11. Hsu, Yu-Chin & Shen, Shu, 2019. "Testing treatment effect heterogeneity in regression discontinuity designs," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 208(2), pages 468-486.
    12. Hsu, Yu-Chin & Shiu, Ji-Liang & Wan, Yuanyuan, 2024. "Testing identification conditions of LATE in fuzzy regression discontinuity designs," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 241(1).
    13. Toru Kitagawa & Aleksey Tetenov, 2017. "Who should be treated? Empirical welfare maximization methods for treatment choice," CeMMAP working papers 24/17, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    14. Beare, Brendan K. & Shi, Xiaoxia, 2019. "An improved bootstrap test of density ratio ordering," Econometrics and Statistics, Elsevier, vol. 10(C), pages 9-26.
    15. David Lander & David Gunawan & William Griffiths & Duangkamon Chotikapanich, 2020. "Bayesian assessment of Lorenz and stochastic dominance," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 53(2), pages 767-799, May.
    16. Arvanitis, Stelios & Topaloglou, Nikolas, 2017. "Testing for prospect and Markowitz stochastic dominance efficiency," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 198(2), pages 253-270.
    17. Chuang, O-Chia & Kuan, Chung-Ming & Tzeng, Larry Y., 2017. "Testing for central dominance: Method and application," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 196(2), pages 368-378.
    18. Lok, Thomas M. & Tabri, Rami V., 2021. "An improved bootstrap test for restricted stochastic dominance," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 224(2), pages 371-393.
    19. Yu-Chin Hsu & Robert P. Lieli, 2021. "Inference for ROC Curves Based on Estimated Predictive Indices," Papers 2112.01772, arXiv.org.
    20. Mariusz Górajski & Zbigniew Kuchta, 2022. "Which hallmarks of optimal monetary policy rules matter in Poland? A stochastic dominance approach," Bank i Kredyt, Narodowy Bank Polski, vol. 53(2), pages 149-182.
    21. Chung, D. & Linton, O. & Whang Y-J., 2021. "Consistent Testing for an Implication of Supermodular Dominance," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 2134, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    22. Sun, Zhenting, 2023. "Instrument validity for heterogeneous causal effects," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 237(2).
    23. Brendan K. Beare & Jackson D. Clarke, 2022. "Modified Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney tests of stochastic dominance," Papers 2210.08892, arXiv.org.
    24. David Lander & David Gunawan & William E. Griffiths & Duangkamon Chotikapanich, 2016. "Bayesian Assessment of Lorenz and Stochastic Dominance Using a Mixture of Gamma Densities," Department of Economics - Working Papers Series 2023, The University of Melbourne.
    25. Yu‐Chin Hsu & Shu Shen, 2021. "Testing monotonicity of conditional treatment effects under regression discontinuity designs," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 36(3), pages 346-366, April.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • C01 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - General - - - Econometrics
    • C12 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Hypothesis Testing: General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:emetrv:v:35:y:2016:i:4:p:553-585. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/LECR20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.