IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/edecon/v33y2025i2p293-310.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do college students demand lower tuition for online learning? Empirical evidence from choice experiments during COVID-19

Author

Listed:
  • H. Holly Wang
  • Yizhou Hua
  • Christine Wilson

Abstract

To address student concerns about full tuition rates while taking online courses during COVID-19, we conducted choice experiments at a representative U.S. land-grant university to elicit students’ willingness-to-pay for alternative course delivery modes. Results show that students demanded 30% and 7% tuition discounts for fully online and hybrid learning, respectively. A welfare analysis further reveals that 63% of the total welfare loss during Fall 2020–Spring 2022 was compensated for by the Higher Education Emergency Relief Fund (HEERF) funding. Based on our findings, we suggest measures to facilitate students’ learning experiences and emphasize the importance of leveraging government appropriations.

Suggested Citation

  • H. Holly Wang & Yizhou Hua & Christine Wilson, 2025. "Do college students demand lower tuition for online learning? Empirical evidence from choice experiments during COVID-19," Education Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(2), pages 293-310, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:edecon:v:33:y:2025:i:2:p:293-310
    DOI: 10.1080/09645292.2024.2318215
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09645292.2024.2318215
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09645292.2024.2318215?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:edecon:v:33:y:2025:i:2:p:293-310. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CEDE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.