Author
Abstract
The question of why postsecondary institutions produce different labor market outcomes is difficult to answer due to unobserved student characteristics. Here, I leverage students' geographic proximity to three classifications of postsecondary institutions – earnings-enhancing, competitive, and Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs). Using a nationally representative sample, I estimate attainment and earnings effects of first attending each type. Attending an institution classified as earnings-enhancing increases humanities credit completion, degree attainment, and early-career wages. Among underrepresented students, living closest to an HBCU strongly predicts HBCU enrollment. This yields higher STEM credit completion but lower early-career wages, suggesting possible labor market bias.Abbreviations: Competitive: Barron's Top 3 Selectivity Tier Institution; HBCU:Historically Black College or University; HSI: High-Success Institution; STEM: Science; Technology; Engineering; and Mathematics; Underrepresented Minority (URM): Black; Indigenous; or Hispanic/LatinxHIGHLIGHTS Nearest-college attributes predict college choice for many high school students, especially those living near HBCUs.Colleges previously linked to students' wage mobility yield higher earnings by students' mid-20s.Higher earnings effects coincide with higher humanities credit completion, bachelor's completion, and postbaccalaureate training.HBCU attendance relative to other options yields higher STEM credit completion, but lower early-career wages.HBCU attendance relative to no college also increases humanities credit completion and bachelor's degree completion.
Suggested Citation
Jennifer L. Steele, 2024.
"Which college types increase earnings? Estimates from geographic proximity,"
Education Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(6), pages 812-827, November.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:edecon:v:32:y:2024:i:6:p:812-827
DOI: 10.1080/09645292.2023.2265594
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:edecon:v:32:y:2024:i:6:p:812-827. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CEDE20 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.