IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/ecsysr/v36y2024i2p265-291.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A new alternative for matrix balancing under conflicting information

Author

Listed:
  • Fernando de la Torre Cuevas
  • Xesús Pereira
  • Edelmiro López-Iglesias

Abstract

Balancing input–output tables using iterative proportional fitting techniques can be prevented due to conflicting information. What is to be done in such cases? Literature suggests a wide variety of alternative methods. Within iterative proportional fitting techniques, modifying the constraint set to circumvent conflicting information problems has been suggested as a promising avenue. Following this approach, we identify some opportunities for improvement not yet been addressed. As a result of this research, we present an iterative proportional fitting variant. Our algorithm uses information contained in the matrix to be balanced for dynamically modifying our constraint set. We ensure economically meaningful solutions, avoiding unsought sign flips. We also respect all macroeconomic aggregates. To illustrate our findings, we provide an empirical example based on the supply-use tables for the region of Galicia (Northwest Spain). Results suggest that our methodological proposal can yield estimates almost as accurate as other alternatives while avoiding undesired outcomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Fernando de la Torre Cuevas & Xesús Pereira & Edelmiro López-Iglesias, 2024. "A new alternative for matrix balancing under conflicting information," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(2), pages 265-291, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:ecsysr:v:36:y:2024:i:2:p:265-291
    DOI: 10.1080/09535314.2023.2170217
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09535314.2023.2170217
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09535314.2023.2170217?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:ecsysr:v:36:y:2024:i:2:p:265-291. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CESR20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.