IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/ecsysr/v14y2002i4p407-425.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Externalities of R&D Expenditures

Author

Listed:
  • Erik Dietzenbacher
  • Bart Los

Abstract

Innovation is generally recognized as a major source of economic growth. R&D investments explicitly aim at generating innovations and creating knowledge. Since knowledge has certain public good properties, positive externalities are likely to exist. In this paper, we extend well-known concepts from the input-output literature (backward multipliers) to indicate at which commodities stimuli should be targeted to enhance R&D and its positive externalities in the economy as a whole. Next, we argue that there may also be negative externalities of R&D, due to increased prices. This issue can be studied by means of forward multipliers. Both concepts are applied to the United States, 1977-90.

Suggested Citation

  • Erik Dietzenbacher & Bart Los, 2002. "Externalities of R&D Expenditures," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(4), pages 407-425, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:ecsysr:v:14:y:2002:i:4:p:407-425
    DOI: 10.1080/0953531022000024860
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/0953531022000024860
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/0953531022000024860?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Athena Belegri-Roboli & Panayotis Michaelides, 2005. "Measurement of R&D Multipliers: The Case of Greece," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 30(3), pages 327-332, July.
    2. Brautzsch, Hans-Ulrich & Günther, Jutta & Loose, Brigitte & Ludwig, Udo & Nulsch, Nicole, 2015. "Can R&D subsidies counteract the economic crisis? – Macroeconomic effects in Germany," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(3), pages 623-633.
    3. Stephen Chong & Rutger Hoekstra & Oscar Lemmers & Ilke Van Beveren & Marcel Van Den Berg & Ron Van Der Wal & Piet Verbiest, 2019. "The role of small- and medium-sized enterprises in the Dutch economy: an analysis using an extended supply and use table," Journal of Economic Structures, Springer;Pan-Pacific Association of Input-Output Studies (PAPAIOS), vol. 8(1), pages 1-24, December.
    4. Massón-Guerra, José Luis & Vendrell-Ferrero, Ferran, 2008. "Entrepreneurship Spillover and the determinants of Key Sectors for new business creation: An inter-sectorial approach," MPRA Paper 10748, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Massón-Guerra, José Luis, 2008. "The Multipliers and Key Sectors of Entrepreneurship Spillover: An input-output approach," MPRA Paper 10733, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Cresti, Lorenzo & Dosi, Giovanni & Fagiolo, Giorgio, 2023. "Technological interdependencies and employment changes in European industries," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 41-57.
    7. Giovanni Cerulli & Bianca Poti`, 2009. "Measuring Intersectoral Knowledge Spillovers: An Application Of Sensitivity Analysis To Italy," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(4), pages 409-436.
    8. Świeczewska Iwona, 2014. "The Externalities of Enterprises’ Innovative Activity – An Input-Output Approach," Folia Oeconomica Stetinensia, Sciendo, vol. 13(2), pages 146-157, July.
    9. Amitrajeet Batabyal & Peter Nijkamp, 2013. "A multi-region model of economic growth with human capital and negative externalities in innovation," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 909-924, September.
    10. Petr Pleticha, 2021. "Heterogeneity of Returns to Business R&D: What Makes a Difference?," Prague Economic Papers, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2021(3), pages 253-271.
    11. María Tugores & Elisabeth Valle, 2016. "Innovation, hotel occupancy, and regional growth," Tourism Economics, , vol. 22(4), pages 749-762, August.
    12. Barbara Diaz & Laura Moniche & Antonio Morillas, 2006. "A Fuzzy clustering approach to the key sectors of the Spanish economy," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(3), pages 299-318.
    13. Mardones, Cristian & Velásquez, Andrés, 2021. "Macroeconomic, intersectoral, and environmental effects of R&D subsidies in Chile: An input-output approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    14. Massón Guerra, José Luis, 2007. "El capital empresarial como determinante de la productividad y el crecimiento en España [The Impact of Entrepreneurship Capital on Spanish's Labor Productivity and Economic Growth]," MPRA Paper 4073, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    15. Julio Sanchez-Choliz & Rosa Duarte, 2003. "Production Chains and Linkage Indicators," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(4), pages 481-494.
    16. Markaki, Maria & Papadakis, Stelios, 2024. "Productive Structure Optimization under Macroeconomic Constraints based on Input-Output Analysis," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 91-105.
    17. Gomes, Alexandre & Perobelli, Fernando & Pio, João, 2016. "The Impact of expenditure on R & D within the Brazilian economy: an approach to Computable General Equilibrium," Conference papers 330169, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    18. João Gabriel Pio & Eduardo Gonçalves & Claúdio R. F. Vasconcelos, 2021. "Technology Spillovers Through Exports: Empirical Evidence for the Chinese Case," Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 423-443, September.
    19. Mikuláš Luptáčik & Wolfgang Koller & Bernhard Mahlberg & Herwig W. Schneider, 2008. "Growth and Employment Potentials of Chosen Technology Fields," Czech Economic Review, Charles University Prague, Faculty of Social Sciences, Institute of Economic Studies, vol. 2(1), pages 041-075, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:ecsysr:v:14:y:2002:i:4:p:407-425. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CESR20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.