IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/ecsysr/v12y2000i1p113-129.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of Two Methods of Identifying Input-Output Coefficients for Exogenous Estimation

Author

Listed:
  • Ali Reza Jalili

Abstract

Input-output (IO) updating research indicates substantial improvements in the forecasts when some of the coefficients have been exogenously estimated and included in the updating process. Several methods for identifying the appropriate subsets have been proposed. The present paper attempts to assess the relative performances of two such approaches: 'the largest coefficients' and 'the most important parameters' criteria. Utilizing these criteria, a set of coefficients from the 1966 IO table of the former Soviet Union were selected and exogenously determined. The remaining coefficients were updated to 1972 by means of naive, RAS, and Lagrangian techniques. Comparison of the results with the 1972 benchmark table provided the desired answers.

Suggested Citation

  • Ali Reza Jalili, 2000. "Comparison of Two Methods of Identifying Input-Output Coefficients for Exogenous Estimation," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(1), pages 113-129.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:ecsysr:v:12:y:2000:i:1:p:113-129
    DOI: 10.1080/095353100111317
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/095353100111317
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/095353100111317?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mun-Heng Toh, 1998. "The RAS Approach in Updating Input-Output Matrices: An Instrumental Variable Interpretation and Analysis of Structural Change," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(1), pages 63-78.
    2. Parikh, Ashok, 1979. "Forecasts of Input-Output Matrices Using the R.A.S. Method," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 61(3), pages 477-481, August.
    3. Bullard, Clark W, III & Sebald, Anthony V, 1977. "Effects of Parametric Uncertainty and Technological Change on Input-Output Models," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 59(1), pages 75-81, February.
    4. West, G R, 1982. "Sensitivity and Key Sector Analysis in Input-Output Models," Australian Economic Papers, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(39), pages 365-378, December.
    5. Carl F. Christ, 1955. "A Review of Input-Output Analysis," NBER Chapters, in: Input-Output Analysis: An Appraisal, pages 137-182, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    6. Hewings, Geoffrey J. D., 1984. "The role of prior information in updating regional input-output models," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 18(5), pages 319-336.
    7. F J Harrigan & J W McGilvray & I H McNicoll, 1980. "Simulating the Structure of a Regional Economy," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 12(8), pages 927-936, August.
    8. Frederick T. Moore, 1955. "A Survey of Current Interindustry Models," NBER Chapters, in: Input-Output Analysis: An Appraisal, pages 215-252, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    9. Allen, R I G, 1974. "Some Experiments with the RAS Method of Updating Input-Output Coefficients," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, vol. 36(3), pages 215-228, August.
    10. Bullard, Clark W & Sebald, Anthony V, 1988. "Monte Carlo Sensitivity Analysis of Input-Output Models," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 70(4), pages 708-712, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Amos Golan & Stephen Vogel, 2000. "Estimation of Non-Stationary Social Accounting Matrix Coefficients with Supply-Side Information," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(4), pages 447-471.
    2. Jan A van der Linden & Erik Dietzenbacher, 2000. "The Determinants of Structural Change in the European Union: A New Application of RAS," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 32(12), pages 2205-2229, December.
    3. Xuemei Jiang & Erik Dietzenbacher & Bart Los, 2010. "Targeting the Collection of Superior Data for the Estimation of the Intermediate Deliveries in Regional Input–Output Tables," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 42(10), pages 2508-2526, October.
    4. Georgios Lampiris & Christos Karelakis & Efstratios Loizou, 2020. "Comparison of non-survey techniques for constructing regional input–output tables," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 294(1), pages 225-266, November.
    5. Xesús Pereira-López & Napoleón Guillermo Sánchez-Chóez & Melchor Fernández-Fernández, 2021. "Performance of bidimensional location quotients for constructing input–output tables," Journal of Economic Structures, Springer;Pan-Pacific Association of Input-Output Studies (PAPAIOS), vol. 10(1), pages 1-16, December.
    6. Erik Dietzenbacher & Bart Los, 2000. "Structural Decomposition Analyses with Dependent Determinants," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(4), pages 497-514.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ali Jalili, 2000. "Exogenous information and input-output updating: An evaluation," International Advances in Economic Research, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 6(1), pages 50-66, February.
    2. Jan A van der Linden & Erik Dietzenbacher, 2000. "The Determinants of Structural Change in the European Union: A New Application of RAS," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 32(12), pages 2205-2229, December.
    3. Umed Temurshoev, 2015. "Uncertainty treatment in input-output analysis," Working Papers 2015-004, Universidad Loyola Andalucía, Department of Economics.
    4. Ashkan Masouman & Charles Harvie, 2017. "Measuring Economic Change in the Illawarra, New South Wales: An Integrated Framework," Australian Economic Review, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, vol. 50(3), pages 294-308, July.
    5. Ramos-Carvajal, Carmen & Lasarte-Navamuel, Elena & Hewings, Geoffrey J.D., 2024. "Some considerations on assessing the importance of a coefficient," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    6. Manfred Lenzen, 2001. "A Generalized Input-Output Multiplier Calculus for Australia," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(1), pages 65-92.
    7. Gurgul, Henryk, 2007. "Stochastic input-output modeling," MPRA Paper 68573, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2007.
    8. repec:dgr:rugsom:95d36 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Guilhoto, Joaquim José Martins & Conceição, Pedro H.Z. da & Crocomo, Francisco C., 1996. "Estruturas de produção, consumo, e distribuição de renda na economia brasileira: 1975 e 1980 comparados [Production, consumption and income distribution structures in Brazilian economy: 1975 and 19," MPRA Paper 54749, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Guilhoto, Joaquim J.M., 1995. "Um modelo computável de equilíbrio geral para planejamento e análise de políticas agrícolas (PAPA) na economia brasileira [A computable general equilibrium model for planning and analysis of agricu," MPRA Paper 42349, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Guilhoto, Joaquim José Martins & Sonis, Michael & Hewings, Geoffrey J.D. & Martins, Eduardo B., 1994. "Índices de ligações e setores chave na economia brasileira: 1959-1980 [Linkages and key-sectors in the Brazilian economy: 1959-180]," MPRA Paper 54759, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    12. Steven G. Cochrane, 1990. "Input-Output Linkages in a Frontier Region of Indonesia," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 13(1-2), pages 183-203, April.
    13. Ayele Gelan & Geoffrey J. D. Hewings & Ahmad Alawadhi, 2021. "Diversifying a resource-dependent economy: private–public relationships in the Kuwaiti economy," Journal of Economic Structures, Springer;Pan-Pacific Association of Input-Output Studies (PAPAIOS), vol. 10(1), pages 1-22, December.
    14. Sonis, Michael & Guilhoto, Joaquim José Martins & Hewings, Geoffrey J.D., 1995. "The Asian economy: trade structure interpreted by feedback loop analysis," MPRA Paper 54756, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    15. Marco Percoco, 2004. "A Statistical Model for the Identification of Key Sectors in I-O Models," ERSA conference papers ersa04p90, European Regional Science Association.
    16. Marco Percoco & Geoffrey Hewings & Lanfranco Senn, 2006. "Structural change decomposition through a global sensitivity analysis of input-output models," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(2), pages 115-131.
    17. Francesc Sastre & Javier Rey-Maquieira & Italo Arbulú, 2017. "The euro crisis, fiscal devaluation, and impacts on the tourism sector in the Spanish economy," Tourism Economics, , vol. 23(4), pages 816-833, June.
    18. Sonis, Michael & Guilhoto, Joaquim José Martins & Hewings, Geoffrey J.D. & Martins, Eduardo B., 1995. "Linkages, key sectors and structural change: some new perspectives," MPRA Paper 54754, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    19. Daniel Moran & Richard Wood, 2014. "Convergence Between The Eora, Wiod, Exiobase, And Openeu'S Consumption-Based Carbon Accounts," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(3), pages 245-261, September.
    20. Ronald E. Miller & Umed Temurshoev, 2017. "Output Upstreamness and Input Downstreamness of Industries/Countries in World Production," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 40(5), pages 443-475, September.
    21. Kumar, Indraneel & Tyner, Wallace E. & Sinha, Kumares C., 2016. "Input–output life cycle environmental assessment of greenhouse gas emissions from utility scale wind energy in the United States," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 294-301.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:ecsysr:v:12:y:2000:i:1:p:113-129. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CESR20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.