IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/deveza/v40y2023i2p390-405.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effectiveness in the small enterprise state grant-funded programme performance – a balanced scorecard application

Author

Listed:
  • Timothy Olaniyi Aluko
  • Paul Kibuuka

Abstract

This article presents and discusses theoretical and conceptual models to measure the effectiveness of a state grant-funded programme. The models were used to formulate the perspectives and strategic objectives a state programme can consider to implement and evaluate performance. The behavioural experiments method was adopted to test the validity of the study assumptions. The methodological contribution of the study is the development and application of balanced scorecard perspectives broken down into key performance objectives and key performance indicators evaluated in terms of an effective level scale. The lowest effectiveness level implies that the overall performance is very low while the highest effectiveness level implies that the performance of the programme is optimised. The study contributes to the current debate and a deviation from previous research. The fact that there is a direct link between expectations of performance, effectiveness and the objectives of publicly-funded programmes is another empirical contribution worth pursuing.

Suggested Citation

  • Timothy Olaniyi Aluko & Paul Kibuuka, 2023. "Effectiveness in the small enterprise state grant-funded programme performance – a balanced scorecard application," Development Southern Africa, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(2), pages 390-405, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:deveza:v:40:y:2023:i:2:p:390-405
    DOI: 10.1080/0376835X.2022.2036595
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/0376835X.2022.2036595
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/0376835X.2022.2036595?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:deveza:v:40:y:2023:i:2:p:390-405. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CDSA20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.