IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/defpea/v35y2024i8p957-991.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Taliban’s Return to Power: An Empirical Analysis of the Afghan Peace Negotiations of 2018–2020

Author

Listed:
  • Rafiuddin Najam

Abstract

Peace negotiations reduce violence and facilitate a roadmap to prosperity and stability. This study assesses the immediate effects of four significant events during the Afghan peace talks on the 7-day district-level averages of violent incidents and fatalities during 2018-2020. I use a regression discontinuity in time design to test game-theoretic predictions and an event study analysis to highlight the districts with concentrated effects. The initiation of US – Taliban talks escalated violence, particularly that between the Taliban and Afghan forces in highly violent districts. Conversely, the cancellation of talks and US – Taliban deal agreement substantially reduced violent incidents, specifically those between Afghan forces and the Taliban, in highly violent regions. The meeting between the Afghan government and Taliban reduced the possibility of Afghan forces attacking the Taliban. To indicate their good faith, the Taliban became less violent following certain events; however, this reduction in violence was short-lived. Furthermore, the Afghan government actively engaged in military responses, despite its absence during the US – Taliban talks. After the US – Taliban deal agreement, the Taliban’s aggression increases, whereas Afghan forces’ offense against the Taliban remained below the historical average.

Suggested Citation

  • Rafiuddin Najam, 2024. "The Taliban’s Return to Power: An Empirical Analysis of the Afghan Peace Negotiations of 2018–2020," Defence and Peace Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(8), pages 957-991, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:defpea:v:35:y:2024:i:8:p:957-991
    DOI: 10.1080/10242694.2023.2285461
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10242694.2023.2285461
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/10242694.2023.2285461?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:defpea:v:35:y:2024:i:8:p:957-991. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/GDPE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.