IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/ctwqxx/v33y2012i8p1475-1491.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

‘Living Well’ while ‘Doing Good’? (Missing) debates on altruism and professionalism in aid work

Author

Listed:
  • Anne-Meike Fechter

Abstract

This paper takes at its starting point public criticism of international aid workers who appear to be ‘doing well out of poverty’. Based on fieldwork in Cambodia, the paper suggests that such public perceptions are mirrored by some aid workers' uncertainties about the moral dimensions of their own and others' lifestyles. Significantly, analyses of such public and private unease are largely absent from development ethics, even though comparable professions, such as nursing or social work, having produced substantial work on these issues. I argue that the scarcity of equivalent studies in development studies is partly the result of a tendency to foreground the ‘other’—the world's poor—while rendering those who deliver aid invisible. Placing ‘aid recipients’ and ‘aid givers’ in separate categories, together with an emphasis on collective rather than individual moral responsibilities, not only makes it difficult to conduct open debates on the role of altruism and professionalism among aid workers, but also indicates how practices of ‘othering’ continue to inform aspects of development theory and practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Anne-Meike Fechter, 2012. "‘Living Well’ while ‘Doing Good’? (Missing) debates on altruism and professionalism in aid work," Third World Quarterly, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(8), pages 1475-1491.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:ctwqxx:v:33:y:2012:i:8:p:1475-1491
    DOI: 10.1080/09700161.2012.698133
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09700161.2012.698133
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09700161.2012.698133?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:ctwqxx:v:33:y:2012:i:8:p:1475-1491. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/ctwq .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.