IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/ctwqxx/v33y2012i3p405-422.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Anti-Politics of Development: donor agencies and the political economy of governance

Author

Listed:
  • Wil Hout

Abstract

This article discusses the attempt undertaken by several development aid agencies since the turn of the century to integrate political economy assessments into their decision making on development assistance. The article discusses three such attempts: the Drivers of Change adopted by the UK's Department for International Development, the Strategic Governance and Corruption Analysis (sgaca) developed by the Dutch Directorate General for International Cooperation and the new thinking on political economy analysis, policy reform and political risk advanced by the World Bank. On the basis of a political-economic interpretation of development agencies, two main factors are found to hinder the successful application of political economy assessment. In the first place, the agencies' professional outlook leads them to see development in primarily technical terms. In the second place, the nature of incentives for development professionals leads them to resist the implementation of political economy analyses.

Suggested Citation

  • Wil Hout, 2012. "The Anti-Politics of Development: donor agencies and the political economy of governance," Third World Quarterly, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(3), pages 405-422.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:ctwqxx:v:33:y:2012:i:3:p:405-422
    DOI: 10.1080/01436597.2012.657474
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01436597.2012.657474
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01436597.2012.657474?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Stephen Sherlock, 2020. "Alliances of Instrumental Advantage: Supporting Women’s Agency in Civil Society Organisations in Indonesia," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(4), pages 147-156.
    2. Browne, Katherine Elizabeth & Razafiarimanana, Claudien & Jogannah, Rajini, 2024. "Informal institutions and “Imperfect Equity” in internationally financed adaptation in Madagascar and Mauritius," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    3. Venugopal, Rajesh, 2018. "Ineptitude, ignorance, or intent: The social construction of failure in development," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 238-247.
    4. Wil Hout & Lydeke Schakel, 2014. "SGACA: The Rise and Paradoxical Demise of a Political-Economy Instrument," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 32(5), pages 611-630, September.
    5. Del Biondo, Karen, 2015. "Donor Interests or Developmental Performance? Explaining Sanctions in EU Democracy Promotion in sub-Saharan Africa," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 74-84.
    6. Yanguas, Pablo & Hulme, David, 2015. "Barriers to Political Analysis in Aid Bureaucracies: From Principle to Practice in DFID and the World Bank," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 209-219.
    7. Mikaela Luttrell-Rowland & Sophia Rhee & Whitney Okujagu, 2023. "Dominant Development Indexes’ Construction of Gender and Challenges for Recognizing Everyday Activism for Peace and Security," Progress in Development Studies, , vol. 23(2), pages 152-168, April.
    8. Gautier, Lara & Tosun, Jale & De Allegri, Manuela & Ridde, Valéry, 2018. "How do diffusion entrepreneurs spread policies? Insights from performance-based financing in Sub-Saharan Africa," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 160-175.
    9. Carlitz, Ruth D. & Ziaja, Sebastian, 2021. "Dissecting aid fragmentation: Development goals and levels of analysis," IDOS Discussion Papers 17/2021, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:ctwqxx:v:33:y:2012:i:3:p:405-422. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/ctwq .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.