IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/cpprxx/v39y2024i4p740-752.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

New planning formats in established settings: a reflection on advice and consultancy, inertia and failure in Luxembourg’s planning practice

Author

Listed:
  • Markus Hesse

Abstract

This practice review reflects on the role of planning innovations when confronted with established institutional settings. The case is that of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, whose government has in recent years sought to modernise the means of spatial planning, in which advice, consultation and citizen participation play a certain role. Two processes are critically examined: the revision of the country’s main planning guideline and the pré-figuration of an international building exhibition in a cross-border area. The study concludes that planning innovations will only show their added value if established institutions of public policy and administration modernise themselves accordingly.

Suggested Citation

  • Markus Hesse, 2024. "New planning formats in established settings: a reflection on advice and consultancy, inertia and failure in Luxembourg’s planning practice," Planning Practice & Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(4), pages 740-752, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:cpprxx:v:39:y:2024:i:4:p:740-752
    DOI: 10.1080/02697459.2024.2324238
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/02697459.2024.2324238
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/02697459.2024.2324238?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:cpprxx:v:39:y:2024:i:4:p:740-752. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/cppr20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.