IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/cpprxx/v32y2017i5p556-570.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Indigenous People and the Miserable Failure of Australian Planning

Author

Listed:
  • Libby Porter

Abstract

Major changes in Australian law and significant research efforts have re-positioned Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples as important actors in planning. Yet, this has barely penetrated the consciousness of the mainstream professional community. Current requirements for professional competencies and planning curricula fall well short of preparing planners to productively engage with Indigenous people. The profession itself barely acknowledges the significant changes advanced in Indigenous studies and planning, and the new imperatives. This paper details the contemporary position of planning practice in Australia with regard to Indigenous people and considers the changes required to more justly engage with Indigenous rights.

Suggested Citation

  • Libby Porter, 2017. "Indigenous People and the Miserable Failure of Australian Planning," Planning Practice & Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(5), pages 556-570, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:cpprxx:v:32:y:2017:i:5:p:556-570
    DOI: 10.1080/02697459.2017.1286885
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/02697459.2017.1286885
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/02697459.2017.1286885?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Anthony McCosker & Anne Matan & Dora Marinova, 2018. "Policies, Politics, and Paradigms: Healthy Planning in Australian Local Government," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-25, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:cpprxx:v:32:y:2017:i:5:p:556-570. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/cppr20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.