IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/cpprxx/v31y2016i3p347-357.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Debating Temporary Uses for Vacant Urban Sites: Insights for Practice from a Stakeholder Workshop

Author

Listed:
  • Niamh Moore-Cherry
  • Linda Mccarthy

Abstract

Temporary land uses have become the focus of much debate within academic and policy circles in recent years. Although the international literature contains numerous case studies of temporary interventions, little attention has been paid to the dynamics of the interactions among different stakeholders. This paper reports on a stakeholder workshop that used a participatory research approach to collectively define the issues facing those interested in the potential of vacant urban sites. The paper outlines the goals, design and evaluation of the workshop and concludes with a discussion of suggested lessons for practice that emerged from the workshop sessions.

Suggested Citation

  • Niamh Moore-Cherry & Linda Mccarthy, 2016. "Debating Temporary Uses for Vacant Urban Sites: Insights for Practice from a Stakeholder Workshop," Planning Practice & Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(3), pages 347-357, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:cpprxx:v:31:y:2016:i:3:p:347-357
    DOI: 10.1080/02697459.2016.1158075
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/02697459.2016.1158075
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/02697459.2016.1158075?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. van Heur, Bas, 2024. "Urban vacancy in Europe: A synthetic review and research agenda," SocArXiv 3kmtx, Center for Open Science.
    2. Michael Martin & Stephen Hincks & Iain Deas, 2020. "Temporary use in England’s core cities: Looking beyond the exceptional," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(16), pages 3381-3401, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:cpprxx:v:31:y:2016:i:3:p:347-357. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/cppr20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.