IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/cpprxx/v31y2016i2p215-228.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Plan Evaluation: Challenges and Directions for Future Research

Author

Listed:
  • Dave Guyadeen
  • Mark Seasons

Abstract

Plan evaluation is a well-established part of the planning canon. While this subject has received considerable attention from planning scholars in recent years, plan evaluation methods are not commonly used in practice. This paper examines the factors that contribute to the underuse of plan outcome evaluation in local government planning practice. The concept of evaluation is explained, and the relationship that exists between program evaluation and plan evaluation is explored.

Suggested Citation

  • Dave Guyadeen & Mark Seasons, 2016. "Plan Evaluation: Challenges and Directions for Future Research," Planning Practice & Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(2), pages 215-228, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:cpprxx:v:31:y:2016:i:2:p:215-228
    DOI: 10.1080/02697459.2015.1081335
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/02697459.2015.1081335
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/02697459.2015.1081335?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Simona R. Grădinaru & Cristian Ioan Iojă & Ileana Pătru-Stupariu & Anna M. Hersperger, 2017. "Are Spatial Planning Objectives Reflected in the Evolution of Urban Landscape Patterns? A Framework for the Evaluation of Spatial Planning Outcomes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-17, July.
    2. Francisco J. Castellano-Álvarez & Ana Nieto Masot & José Castro-Serrano, 2020. "Intangibles of Rural Development. The Case Study of La Vera (Extremadura, Spain)," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-18, June.
    3. Mark Limb & Carl Grodach & Paul Donehue & Severine Mayere, 2021. "When plans are used to no effect: Considering implementation performance of greater Brisbane’s compact activity centre policies," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 48(7), pages 1860-1875, September.
    4. Jianwei Li & Guo'ao Li & Jingang Li & Aoran Liu, 2022. "Integrating conformance and performance for the evaluation of urban planning implementation from a goal-oriented perspective," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 49(2), pages 737-753, February.
    5. Fitzgibbons, Joanne & Mitchell, Carrie L., 2019. "Just urban futures? Exploring equity in “100 Resilient Cities”," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 648-659.
    6. Annet Kempenaar & Marlies Brinkhuijsen & Adri van den Brink, 2019. "The impact of regional designing: New perspectives for the Maastricht/Heerlen, Hasselt/Genk, Aachen and Liège (MHAL) Region," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 46(2), pages 359-376, February.
    7. Sophie C Rudolf & Simona R Grădinaru, 2019. "The quality and implementation of local plans: An integrated evaluation," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 46(5), pages 880-896, June.
    8. Morgan, Edward A. & Osborne, Natalie & Mackey, Brendan, 2022. "Evaluating planning without plans: Principles, criteria and indicators for effective forest landscape approaches," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:cpprxx:v:31:y:2016:i:2:p:215-228. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/cppr20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.