IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/cpprxx/v28y2014i2p186-203.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Inclusion and Transparency in Planning Decision-Making: Planning Officer Reports to the Planning Committee

Author

Listed:
  • Joe Weston
  • Michael Weston

Abstract

Language is central to effective communication and communication is the foundation of the current orthodoxy in planning theory. For communication to be effective in fostering the greater public engagement in planning demanded by communicative and collaborative planning theorists it must be inclusive and transparent. This article examines the language used in the reports produced by planning officers in UK development control decision-making. These reports to planning committees are the only documents available to the public that communicate the local planning authority's assessment of a planning application before a decision is made. They are, therefore, a crucial communication tool in planning and yet are rarely the subject of research. The results of the content analysis of these reports suggests that far from being in the mould of communicative and collaborative planning theory they remain exclusive and shrouded in the language of the rational professional expert.

Suggested Citation

  • Joe Weston & Michael Weston, 2013. "Inclusion and Transparency in Planning Decision-Making: Planning Officer Reports to the Planning Committee," Planning Practice & Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(2), pages 186-203, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:cpprxx:v:28:y:2014:i:2:p:186-203
    DOI: 10.1080/02697459.2012.704736
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/02697459.2012.704736
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/02697459.2012.704736?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Menconi, M.E. & Tasso, S. & Santinelli, M. & Grohmann, D., 2020. "A card game to renew urban parks: Face-to-face and online approach for the inclusive involvement of local community," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:cpprxx:v:28:y:2014:i:2:p:186-203. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/cppr20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.