IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/cpprxx/v27y2012i5p531-552.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measuring Building Adaptability and Street Vitality

Author

Listed:
  • Alan March
  • Yogita Rijal
  • Sara Wilkinson
  • Ebru Firidin Özgür

Abstract

A long-standing urban design principle is that successful places exhibit vitality, being vibrant and diverse. This vitality depends on levels of economic and social success that sustain over time urban diversity including cafes, restaurants, delicatessens, bakeries, cinemas and galleries, grocery stores, pubs and clubs of varying sizes and types to suit individuals of varying taste, preference and socio-economic status. Accordingly, a successful public realm includes a complex ‘transaction base’ of activities. Since vitality occurs in physical, primarily human-made built forms and spaces, the qualities of physically permanent urban places influence vitality. However, the built form may eventually become inappropriate for its original purpose, the use redundant, or changes to demand may occur. Many buildings and spaces, specifically, are therefore refurbished or reused, but time, cost, inability, or environmental constraints associated with changes may impede physical change and therefore the ongoing maintenance and enhancement of places' vitality. Importantly, some physical structures facilitate adaptability better than others overcoming a decline of activity or the need for expensive adaptation or outright demolition and redevelopment.This research examines the suggestion that greater levels of place adaptability facilitates higher levels of ongoing vitality, due to the ability for structures to be used for a range of purposes over time, without the need for changes to physical form, particularly in the move to higher densities. The paper outlines a method for measuring vitality and building adaptability in parallel and reports the results of empirical research of key locations in Melbourne's Central Business District (CBD).It is argued using empirical data that adaptability, when translated to actual adaption, facilitates sustained vitality.

Suggested Citation

  • Alan March & Yogita Rijal & Sara Wilkinson & Ebru Firidin Özgür, 2012. "Measuring Building Adaptability and Street Vitality," Planning Practice & Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(5), pages 531-552.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:cpprxx:v:27:y:2012:i:5:p:531-552
    DOI: 10.1080/02697459.2012.715813
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/02697459.2012.715813
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/02697459.2012.715813?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hongyu Gong & Xiaozihan Wang & Zihao Wang & Ziyi Liu & Qiushan Li & Yunhan Zhang, 2022. "How Did the Built Environment Affect Urban Vibrancy? A Big Data Approach to Post-Disaster Revitalization Assessment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-25, September.
    2. Hongyu Wang & Jian Tang & Pengpeng Xu & Rundong Chen & Haona Yao, 2022. "Research on the Influence Mechanism of Street Vitality in Mountainous Cities Based on a Bayesian Network: A Case Study of the Main Urban Area of Chongqing," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-22, May.
    3. Jian-gang Shi & Wei Miao & Hongyun Si, 2019. "Visualization and Analysis of Mapping Knowledge Domain of Urban Vitality Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-17, February.
    4. Shiwei Lu & Chaoyang Shi & Xiping Yang, 2019. "Impacts of Built Environment on Urban Vitality: Regression Analyses of Beijing and Chengdu, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-16, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:cpprxx:v:27:y:2012:i:5:p:531-552. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/cppr20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.