IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/cposxx/v46y2025i2p252-270.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Public reaction to public-private partnerships (PPPs): citizen assessments of four different types of PPPs and policy support

Author

Listed:
  • Ki Eun Kang
  • Arnold Vedlitz

Abstract

Solving problems through collaborative efforts of public, private, and nonprofit groups has become more important in recent years. One type of public-private partnerships (PPPs) has been studied in some depth – government-business contracts for transportation infrastructure. Little is known, however, about other types of partnership arrangements that deal with other community issues or services and may involve different combinations of actors. And there is little information on how the public views any of the available PPP options and arrangements for possible transportation infrastructure design, development and implementation. This article focuses on the public's views of four PPP transportation infrastructure options. The overall results show that respondents’ do differentiate between types of PPPs and that respondents’ PPP preferences are associated with their views on community engagement policy on infrastructure.

Suggested Citation

  • Ki Eun Kang & Arnold Vedlitz, 2025. "Public reaction to public-private partnerships (PPPs): citizen assessments of four different types of PPPs and policy support," Policy Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(2), pages 252-270, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:cposxx:v:46:y:2025:i:2:p:252-270
    DOI: 10.1080/01442872.2024.2302439
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01442872.2024.2302439
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01442872.2024.2302439?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:cposxx:v:46:y:2025:i:2:p:252-270. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/cpos .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.