IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/cposxx/v33y2012i3p249-262.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The role of faith-based organisations in the Big Society: opportunities and challenges

Author

Listed:
  • Hannah Lambie-Mumford
  • David Jarvis

Abstract

The ‘Big Society’ is a key policy driver for the new UK Government. It is an agenda which purports to re-establish the relationship between the state and civil society, raising important questions for social policy. Driving this agenda is a focus on a reduced role for government, based on the notion that local communities and organisations are best placed to identify and respond to local needs. The voluntary and community sector (VCS) is posited as having a key role to play in this and the article looks at the particular case of faith-based organisations (FBOs), drawing on empirical work in Oxfordshire. Reflecting research findings, the article identifies opportunities for FBOs framed in the overarching promise of the Big Society to harness and support the potential of local responses to community needs. At the same time, key challenges are identified in relation to how the policy agenda will be implemented in reality. Specifically, policy makers face a dilemma in relation to, on the one hand maintaining standards of delivery and promoting social justice, and on the other protecting the characteristics which enable VCS organisations generally, and FBOs in particular, to meet the needs of their local community effectively in ways they feel are appropriate.

Suggested Citation

  • Hannah Lambie-Mumford & David Jarvis, 2012. "The role of faith-based organisations in the Big Society: opportunities and challenges," Policy Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(3), pages 249-262.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:cposxx:v:33:y:2012:i:3:p:249-262
    DOI: 10.1080/01442872.2012.666395
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01442872.2012.666395
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01442872.2012.666395?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:cposxx:v:33:y:2012:i:3:p:249-262. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/cpos .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.