IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/cposxx/v33y2012i3p215-230.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Towards (un)sustainable employment? Exploring policy responses to work-welfare cycling

Author

Listed:
  • David McCollum

Abstract

Employment policies have conventionally focused on the transition from welfare to work. However, many of those who leave out of work benefits for employment return to them again relatively quickly, meaning that some people perpetually cycle between work and welfare for much of their working lives. This article considers policy responses to labour market disadvantage in the UK and the extent to which they can help and hinder individuals’ efforts to sustain employment. Evidence based on 130 semi-structured interviews with work-welfare ‘cyclers’, service providers and employers in Glasgow and Dundee is presented and an argument developed which contends that policy responses to employment instability are currently limited in scope and promote only an unambitious conception of sustainable employment. This article argues that employment policies need to go beyond their almost exclusive focus of getting people into work per se and instead give greater priority to promoting sustainable transitions into employment. The research finds that a more sophisticated funding and evaluation framework for contracting out provision and steps to combat the unsustainable nature of the jobs that many jobseekers are restricted to would represent positive steps in the direction of a welfare-in-work policy agenda.

Suggested Citation

  • David McCollum, 2012. "Towards (un)sustainable employment? Exploring policy responses to work-welfare cycling," Policy Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(3), pages 215-230.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:cposxx:v:33:y:2012:i:3:p:215-230
    DOI: 10.1080/01442872.2012.658259
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01442872.2012.658259
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01442872.2012.658259?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:cposxx:v:33:y:2012:i:3:p:215-230. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/cpos .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.